首页> 外文会议>2003 Information Resources Management Association International Conference Vol.1; May 18-21, 2003; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA >Surfacing Occupational Threats to Electronic Government - A Neglected Role for Organization Development?
【24h】

Surfacing Occupational Threats to Electronic Government - A Neglected Role for Organization Development?

机译:对电子政府施加职业威胁-组织发展的被忽视角色?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

While the process of introducing IT into work organisations warrants an integrated perspective on economic, technical, human and organisational aspects of IT, it appears that technical and economic considerations dominate the practitioner landscape. Paradoxically, when IT fails to deliver as it so often does, human and organisational considerations are the prime determinants of such underperformance and failure. This poses an intractable dilemma for many organisations. The dilemma is of an enduring nature, sustained by the behavioural patterns of polarised occupational groups who have vested, but divergent, interests in exploiting IT. Executive management tend to view the introduction of IT as an economic imperative while IT specialists tend to view it as a technical imperative. The coalescent nature of these two imperatives is such that human and organisational considerations are regularly marginalized and ignored during the process of introducing IT into work organisations. Implementing a more integrated approach to the introduction of IT that accounts for economic, technical, human, and organisational considerations is inherently difficult since the requisite knowledge and expertise are widely dispersed among diverse occupational groups (Clegg et al, 1996; Andriole and Freeman, 1993; Clegg et al, 1997; McDonagh and Coghlan, 1999; 2000). This calls for expertise that cuts across the social, behavioural, computer, mathematical, engineering, management, and even physical sciences' (Andriole and Freeman, 1993). 'Those who understand the technology tend not to appreciate the wider organisational issues, and those who have the knowledge of these are often technically naive. This places a very high premium on finding ways of integrating different forms of knowledge and expertise' (Clegg et al, 1996).
机译:尽管将IT引入工作组织的过程需要对IT的经济,技术,人员和组织方面有一个综合的看法,但似乎技术和经济方面的考虑主导了从业人员的状况。矛盾的是,当IT不能像通常那样交付时,人员和组织方面的考虑因素就是造成这种性能不足和故障的主要原因。这为许多组织带来了棘手的难题。这种两难困境是持久的,由两极分化的职业群体的行为模式所维持,这些职业群体对利用IT既得利益却产生分歧。行政管理人员倾向于将引入IT视为经济上的当务之急,而IT专家则倾向于将其视为技术上的当务之急。这两个必要条件的结合性质是,在将IT引入工作组织的过程中,经常会边缘化和忽略人为因素和组织方面的考虑。由于需要的知识和专业知识广泛地分散在不同的职业群体中,因此实施一种更加综合的方法来引入IT来解决经济,技术,人力和组织方面的问题是固有的困难(Clegg等,1996; Andriole和Freeman,1993) ; Clegg等,1997; McDonagh和Coghlan,1999; 2000)。这需要跨越社会,行为,计算机,数学,工程,管理甚至物理科学的专业知识(Andriole和Freeman,1993)。那些了解技术的人往往不会欣赏更广泛的组织问题,而那些了解这些技术的人通常在技术上是天真的。这为寻找整合不同形式的知识和专长的方法提供了非常高的溢价(Clegg等,1996)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号