首页> 外文会议>SPE annual technical conference and exhibition;SPE 2002 >Sand Control: Sand Characterization, Failure Mechanisms, and Completion Methods
【24h】

Sand Control: Sand Characterization, Failure Mechanisms, and Completion Methods

机译:防砂:砂的表征,破坏机理和完井方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Sand production has historically been a problem associatedrnwith some consolidated, poorly consolidated, andrnunconsolidated sand formations. The result is usually lostrnproduction due to formation sand and fines plugging gravelrnpacks, screens, perforations, tubular, and surface flow linesrnor separators.rnCompletion methods applied to minimize sand productionrninclude: gravel packing, sand consolidation, criticalrnproduction rate, oriented/selective perforation, FracPacking, orrnany combination of these methods. These techniques are usedrnin consolidated, poorly consolidated, and unconsolidated sandrnformations. However, there are no guidelines available in thernliterature on how these methods are selected.rnMechanisms for sand failure include: tensile, shear,rncohesive, and pore collapse. Additionally, failure due tornchemical effects can occur when the cementation materials arernweakened due to chemical interactions. Many mathematicalrnmodels have been presented in the literature to predict sandrnfailure, and consequently determine sand production. Thesernmodels are based on different failure mechanisms and include:rnpressure drawdown/compressive strength, failure based on arngiven failure criterion such as Mohr Coulomb, cohesivernstrength failure, elastoplastic failure around a perforation,rnviscoplastic modeling, and empirical correlations. However,rnthere are no guidelines on how these models are applied basedrnon the characteristics of the sand formation.rnExperimental studies have been presented in the literaturernto model sand failure. These studies include sand arching,rnhollow cylinder strength, triaxial and hydrostatic, and largernscale testing. Laboratory testing are designed to study a givenrnfailure mechanism, and thus to predict sand production.rnThe objective of this paper is to categorize sandrnformations that potentially exhibit sand failure and sandrnproduction. Based on this characterization, an appropriaternlaboratory testing and mathematical modeling arernrecommended, and a completion method is suggested.rnExamples from standstone reservoirs in Saudi Arabia will bernused to demonstrate certain methods used for sand control.
机译:从历史上看,制砂一直是一些固结,固结差和未固结砂层的问题。结果通常是由于地层砂和细粒堵塞砾石填充物,筛网,射孔,管状和地面流水线或分离器而导致生产损失。为使砂子产量最小化而采用的完井方法包括:砾石充填,砂子固结,临界生产率,定向/选择性射孔,FracPacking,这些方法的组合。这些技术用于固结,弱固结和未固结砂岩地层。但是,文献中没有有关如何选择这些方法的指南。砂土破坏的机制包括:拉伸,剪切,黏结和孔隙塌陷。另外,当由于化学相互作用而使胶结材料变弱时,由于化学作用而引起的失效可能发生。文献中已经提出了许多数学模型来预测砂土破坏,从而确定砂的产量。这些模型基于不同的破坏机制,包括:压降/抗压强度,基于已知的破坏准则(例如Mohr Coulomb)的破坏,内聚强度破坏,穿孔周围的弹塑性破坏,粘塑性模型以及经验相关性。然而,根据砂层的特征,没有关于如何应用这些模型的指导原则。文献中已经进行了关于砂土破坏模型的实验研究。这些研究包括砂拱效应,空心圆柱强度,三轴和静水压力以及大规模试验。设计实验室测试旨在研究给定的破坏机理,从而预测出砂。本文的目的是对可能表现出出砂破坏和出砂的砂岩形态进行分类。在此基础上,提出了合适的实验室测试方法和数学模型,并提出了完井方法。本文以沙特阿拉伯砂岩储层为例,说明了某些防砂方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号