【24h】

EVALUATING AND MANAGING DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM WATER QUALITY

机译:评估和管理分配系统水质

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In the past, many utilities and regulators evaluated the quality of drinking water within the distribution system based on and water entering the system and system averages. This paradigm is changing. The trend is now towards a concept of "environmental equity" where all consumers should receive similar water quality. This new paradigm is reflected in upcoming regulations. For example, the Stage I Disinfection By-Product (DBP) Rule will require monitoring at a location representing maximum residence time. To go a step further, Stage II DBP Rule compliance will be based on the running annual average at each monitoring location. The reason for this change is exemplified in Figures 1 and 2 which show the running annual average trihalomethane (THM) and haloacetic acid (HAA) levels at the filter effluent (filt), clearwell effluent (fin), a distribution system location near the plant (DSE), two sites of average residence time (AVG), and the location of maximum residence time (MAX) from a surface water plant which uses free chlorine for disinfection.
机译:过去,许多公用事业和监管机构都是根据供水系统的进水量和系统平均水准来评估分配系统中饮用水的质量。这种范例正在改变。现在的趋势是朝着“环境公平”的概念发展,所有消费者都应获得相似的水质。新的范式反映在即将到来的法规中。例如,第一阶段消毒副产物(DBP)规则将要求在代表最大停留时间的位置进行监控。更进一步,第二阶段DBP规则合规性将基于每个监视位置的年度平均值。发生这种变化的原因在图1和图2中得到了说明,图1和图2显示了过滤器出水(filt),净井出水(fin)和工厂附近分配系统位置的运行年平均三卤甲烷(THM)和卤乙酸(HAA)水平。 (DSE),平均停留时间(AVG)的两个位置,以及使用游离氯进行消毒的地表水厂的最大停留时间(MAX)的位置。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号