首页> 外文会议>1st International Conference on Orange Technologies >A contrastive study of E-book and paper-book reading behaviors: The case of the JinYong Reader
【24h】

A contrastive study of E-book and paper-book reading behaviors: The case of the JinYong Reader

机译:电子书和纸质书阅读行为的对比研究:以金庸读者为例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Contrasting with paper-book, E-book has the advantage of taking great amount of information and the accessibility of hyper link. According to the researches which compared the reading behaviors on paper-book to screen, reading on different media cause different reading behaviors (Dillon, 1992; Noyes & Garland, 2008) [1] [2]. E-book reader is going to integrate the advantages of paper-book and e-book to become a main vehicle of knowledge. Our study take JinYong reader for example, hypothesize that e-book reader would cause different behaviors from paper-book. And if e-book reader would become the main vehicle of knowledge in the future, then it must have equivalent legibility and usability to paper-book. Experiment 1 is a usability test. We recruited the users who take a lot of time on reading to test the function of JinYong Reader, for example, basic operation, highlighting, note taking, and dictionary. The users took mental workload and usability questionnaires after each task. The results show JinYong Reader's slow reaction time, unclear feedback, ease of crash, and ambiguous navigation. We make suggestion for lower crash rate, simplifying the corresponding of button and function, and reducing finger shelter in the discussion. Experiment 2 asked users to read novels separately on e-book reader and paper-book in natural condition, compared their reading behaviors on paper-book to JinYong Reader. The users accepted subjective visual fatigue scale, NASA-TLX mental workload scale, and reading comprehension tests after reading. The result shows the difference on reading speed and subjective visual fatigue between paper-book and JinYong Reader is significant. According to our results, the usability and legibility of paper-book is still better than e-book reader. However, e-book reader provide hyper link and is more convenient to carry information. Also, the disadvantage of JinYong reader does not always happen on the other e-book readers. With the high developmen- of technology, the traditional Chinese e-book reader's evolution is still in prospect.
机译:与纸质书相比,电子书具有占用大量信息和可访问超链接的优势。根据将纸质书与屏幕上的阅读行为进行比较的研究,在不同的媒体上阅读会导致不同的阅读行为(Dillon,1992; Noyes&Garland,2008)[1] [2]。电子书阅读器将整合纸质书和电子书的优势,成为知识的主要载体。我们的研究以金庸读者为例,假设电子书阅读器会导致与纸质书不同的行为。而且,如果电子书阅读器将来成为知识的主要载体,那么它必须具有与纸质书相同的可读性和可用性。实验1是可用性测试。我们招募了花费大量时间阅读的用户来测试JinYong Reader的功能,例如基本操作,突出显示,记笔记和词典。用户在完成每个任务后都进行了心理工作量和可用性问卷调查。结果表明JinYong Reader的反应时间慢,反馈不清楚,崩溃容易并且导航不明确。我们建议降低崩溃率,简化按钮和功能的对应,并减少讨论中的手指遮挡。实验2要求用户在自然条件下分别在电子书阅读器和纸质书上阅读小说,并将他们在纸质书上的阅读行为与金庸阅读器进行比较。用户接受了主观视觉疲劳量表,NASA-TLX心理工作量表以及阅读后的阅读理解测试。结果表明,纸质书和金庸阅读器在阅读速度和主观视觉疲劳上有显着差异。根据我们的结果,纸质书的可用性和可读性仍优于电子书阅读器。然而,电子书阅读器提供了超链接并且更方便地携带信息。同样,金庸阅读器的缺点并不总是发生在其他电子书阅读器上。随着技术的高度发展,传统的中国电子书阅读器的发展仍有望。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号