首页> 外文会议>18th world congress on intelligent transport systems, 2011 ITS America's annual meeting and exposition. >HOW SUSTAINABLE IS ROUTE NAVIGATION? A COMPARISON BETWEEN COMMERCIAL ROUTE PLANNERS AND THE POLICY PRINCIPLES OF ROAD CATEGORIZATIONS
【24h】

HOW SUSTAINABLE IS ROUTE NAVIGATION? A COMPARISON BETWEEN COMMERCIAL ROUTE PLANNERS AND THE POLICY PRINCIPLES OF ROAD CATEGORIZATIONS

机译:路线导航如何可持续?商业路线规划与道路分类政策原则的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In-Vehicle route planning is used to support a driver's route choice and to guide a driver to his/her destination. The suggested route takes less account of environmental aspects, which also could lead to cut-through traffic. Nonetheless, route-guiding systems may provide opportunities to stimulate a sustainable usage of the road network wherefore an integration of route planning and measures to improve traffic livability and safety is essential. The Flanders Spatial Structure plan describes certain categories of roads for the optimization of the road network based on selectively prioritizing either accessibility or livability. The aim of this paper is to examine to what extent route planners apply the principles of this (policy-made) road categorization while calculating a proposed route.rnTo achieve this, relevant origins and destination are selected in the study area, to the southeast of Antwerp. Several route planners are used to calculate routes between each origin/destination relation. Between each origin and destination exists a 'desired' route which follows the principles of the Flemish Spatial Structure plan. The routes suggested by route planners are then compared with the corresponding desired route, after which the road classification usage of route planners can be evaluated. This paper will describe the in-depth analysis of this research.rnFirst results of the research show that different route planners may suggest different routes. These routes can also differ from the desired route based on the Flanders Spatial Structure plan. By comparing planned routes with the corresponding desired routes, differences in road usage are apparent. These deviations are mostly found in the use of low and/or high categorized roads. Especially roads of the lowest category - which should only be used to give access to adjacent parcels - are frequently used by route planners to guide through-traffic without considering the lower function of these roads. For some of these suggested routes, the desired route is a feasible alternative. The desired routes do not necessarily deviate from suggested routes in the matter of time or distance, but will prevent the use of local roads for through-traffic. It is concluded that the implementation of the Flemish road categorization in routing algorithms has the potential to stimulate more sustainable driving behavior with more sustainable route choices.
机译:车载路线规划用于支持驾驶员的路线选择并指导驾驶员到他/她的目的地。建议的路线较少考虑环境方面的问题,这也可能导致直通车流量。但是,路线引导系统可能会提供刺激路网可持续利用的机会,因此必须将路线规划与措施相结合以提高交通的宜居性和安全性。法兰德斯空间结构计划基于选择性地优先考虑可及性或宜居性,描述了用于优化道路网络的某些类别的道路。本文的目的是研究路线规划者在计算拟议路线时在多大程度上应用了这种(政策制定的)道路分类的原则。为此,在研究区域的东南方选择了相关的出发地和目的地。安特卫普几个路线规划器用于计算每个起点/终点关系之间的路线。在每个起点和目的地之间都有一条“所需”路线,该路线遵循佛兰德空间结构计划的原则。然后,将路线规划人员建议的路线与相应的所需路线进行比较,然后可以评估路线规划人员的道路分类使用情况。本文将对该研究进行深入的描述。研究的初步结果表明,不同的路线规划者可能会建议不同的路线。这些路线也可能与基于Flanders空间结构计划的所需路线不同。通过将计划的路线与相应的所需路线进行比较,可以明显看出道路使用的差异。这些偏差主要是在使用低和/或高分类道路时发现的。特别是,类别最低的道路(仅应用于进入相邻包裹的道路)经常被路线规划者用来引导直通车流,而不考虑这些道路的较低功能。对于某些建议的路线,所需路线是可行的替代方案。所需的路线不一定会在时间或距离上偏离建议的路线,但会阻止使用本地道路进行通行。结论是,在路线选择算法中实施佛兰德道路分类有可能通过选择更多可持续的路线来刺激更可持续的驾驶行为。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号