首页> 外文会议>17th World Congress on Ergonomics(第十七届国际人类工效学大会)论文集 >Effects of Table Height and Handholds on Accessibility of Medical Examination Tables for Ambulatory Elder Patients with Mobility Disabilities
【24h】

Effects of Table Height and Handholds on Accessibility of Medical Examination Tables for Ambulatory Elder Patients with Mobility Disabilities

机译:桌子的高度和把手对行动不便的老年移动病人的医疗检查床的可达性的影响

获取原文

摘要

This study evaluated the effects of examination table height and handholds on independent and safe use by ambulatory elder patients with mobility disabilities. Background. These patients have reported difficulty using exam tables and are, in general, at higher risk of falling. They visit medical facilities more frequently and have increased exposure to the falling risks associated with examination table use. Methods. This laboratory study tested use of a height-adjustable medical examination table and several types of handholds by ambulatory elder patient-participants who used walking aids. The participants were asked to complete three series of tasks and then rate their effort, discomfort and feelings of being unsafe. First, they evaluated the table at three heights in combination with three types of handholds, or a table overhang, or neither handhold nor overhang (15 configurations) to sit down on and stand up from the table. Second, they evaluated eight configurations of pull-up support devices to sit up from supine on the table. Third, they were given one or two side railings or no railings to roll from supine onto one side. Results. For getting on and off the table, the medium height was best and side railings were the preferred handhold. The table overhang made no difference. For sitting up on the table, a strap with longitudinal rubbery grips required less effort and caused less discomfort than other aids attached to the table or no aid, but participants preferred side railings. For aid location, the ceiling was preferred to the foot of the table or the sides (railings). For rolling onto one side, railings on both sides were strongly preferred to one railing or none. Conclusion. Within the range tested, exam table height made little difference but handholds showed significant differences in effort, discomfort and feelings of being unsafe, depending on task. Handholds are most important for rolling onto one side, help some people to sit up, and have less impact on standing up.
机译:这项研究评估了检查台高度和把手对行动不便的老年移动患者独立和安全使用的影响。背景。这些患者报告了使用检查表的困难,并且总体上跌倒的风险更高。他们更频繁地访问医疗机构,并增加了因使用检查台而导致的下降风险。方法。这项实验室研究测试了使用高度可调的医疗检查台以及使用助行器的可移动老年患者参与者使用的几种类型的把手。要求参与者完成三个系列的任务,然后评估他们的努力,不适和不安全感。首先,他们在三种高度的桌子上结合三种类型的把手,桌子悬垂物或既没有手柄也没有悬垂物(15种构型)来坐下来并从桌子上站起来,对桌子进行了评估。其次,他们评估了八种上拉支撑装置的配置,以使它们仰卧在桌子上。第三,给他们一个或两个侧栏杆,或者没有栏杆从仰卧滚动到一侧。结果。对于上下车,中等高度是最好的,并且侧栏杆是首选的把手。桌子的伸出没有影响。要坐在桌子上,带纵向橡胶把手的皮带比桌子上附带的其他辅助工具或不需要辅助工具时所需的力气较小,引起的不适感也较小,但参与者更喜欢侧栏杆。对于辅助物的位置,天花板要比桌子的脚或侧面(栏杆)更好。为了在一侧滚动,强烈建议使用两侧的栏杆而不是一个。结论。在所测试的范围内,检查台的高度变化不大,但根据任务的不同,握把的力度,不适感和不安全感也有很大差异。把手对于滚动到一侧,帮助某些人坐起并且对站立的影响较小最重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号