首页> 外文会议>14th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering 2006(ICONE14) vol.3 >EXPERIMENTAL EVALUATION OF ABILITY OF RELAP5, DRAKOreg;, FLOWMASTER2™ AND PROGRAM USING UNSTEADY WALL FRICTION MODEL TO CALCULATE WATER HAMMER LOADINGS ON PIPELINES
【24h】

EXPERIMENTAL EVALUATION OF ABILITY OF RELAP5, DRAKOreg;, FLOWMASTER2™ AND PROGRAM USING UNSTEADY WALL FRICTION MODEL TO CALCULATE WATER HAMMER LOADINGS ON PIPELINES

机译:使用非恒定壁摩擦模型计算管道上水锤载荷的RELAP5,DRAKO®,FLOWMASTER2™和程序的能力的实验评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Mechanical loadings on pipe systems caused by water hammer (hydraulic transients) belong to the most important and most difficult to calculate design loadings in nuclear power plants. The most common procedure in Sweden is to calculate the water hammer loadings on pipe segments, according to the classical 1D theory of liquid transient flow in a pipeline, and then transfer the results to strength analyses of pipeline structure. This procedure assumes that there is quasi-steady respond of the pipeline structure to pressure surges - no dynamic interaction between the fluid and the pipeline construction. The hydraulic loadings are calculated with 1-D so-called "network" programs. Commonly used in Sweden are Relap5, Drako and Flowmaster2 - all using quasi-steady wall friction model. As a third party accredited inspection body INSPECTA NUCLEAR AB reviews calculations of water hammer loadings. The presented work shall be seen as an attempt to illustrate ability of Relap5, Flowmaster2 and Drako programs to calculate the water hammer loadings. A special attention was paid to using of Relap5 for calculation of water hammer pressure surges and forces (including some aspects of influence of Courant number on the calculation results) and also the importance of considering the dynamic (or unsteady) friction models. The calculations are compared with experimental results. The experiments have been conducted at a test rig designed and constructed at the Szewalski Institute of Fluid-Flow Machinery of the Polish Academy of Sciences (IMP PAN) in Gdansk, Poland. The analyses show quite small differences between pressures and forces calculated with Relap5, Flowmaster2 and Drako (the differences regard mainly damping of pressure waves). The comparison of calculated and measured pressures and also a force acting on a pre-defined pipe segment show significant differences. It is shown that the differences can be reduced by using unsteady friction models in calculations. Recently, such models have been subjects of works of several researches in the world.
机译:由水锤(水力瞬变)引起的管道系统机械负荷属于核电厂中最重要和最难计算的设计负荷。在瑞典,最常见的程序是根据经典的一维液体在管道中的瞬态流动理论,计算管段上的水锤载荷,然后将结果传递到管道结构的强度分析中。此过程假定管道结构对压力波动有准稳态响应-流体与管道结构之间没有动态相互作用。使用一维所谓的“网络”程序来计算液压载荷。在瑞典,常用的是Relap5,Drako和Flowmaster2,它们都使用准稳态壁摩擦模型。作为第三方认可的检验机构,INSPECTA NUCLEAR AB审查了水锤载荷的计算。提出的工作应视为试图说明Relap5,Flowmaster2和Drako程序计算水锤载荷的能力。特别注意使用Relap5来计算水锤压力波动和力(包括库兰特数对计算结果的某些影响),以及考虑动态(或非稳态)摩擦模型的重要性。将计算结果与实验结果进行比较。实验是在波兰格但斯克的波兰科学院Szewalski流体流动机械研究所(IMP PAN)设计和建造的试验台上进行的。分析显示,使用Relap5,Flowmaster2和Drako计算出的压力和力之间的差异很小(差异主要涉及压力波的阻尼)。计算压力和测量压力的比较以及作用在预定义管段上的力的比较显示出显着差异。结果表明,通过在计算中使用非恒定摩擦模型可以减小差异。最近,这样的模型已经成为世界上一些研究工作的主题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号