首页> 外文会议>10th International Conference on Advances in Power System Control, Operation amp; Management >Feasibility analysis and comparison of different types of electric vehicles
【24h】

Feasibility analysis and comparison of different types of electric vehicles

机译:不同类型电动汽车的可行性分析与比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

With higher energy efficiency and less carbon intensive, widespread application of electric vehicle (EV) becomes a big trend in many transportation systems. Many cities start their green energy revolution of electric bus and taxi in public transportation systems. In this paper, value chain analysis and life cycle cost (LCC) are utilized to compare the operation feasibility of battery-charging-mode and battery-swapping-mode electric taxi. Quantitative cash flow analysis is presented to evaluate the profitability of the two different modes. The emission reduction of slow charging in battery-swapping-mode is also calculated. By analysis and calculation, it is found out that the Battery-Swapping-Mode needs larger investment to purchase reserve batteries at the initial state, but it will boost the service capability greatly, which is mainly resulted from releasing pure electric taxis' potential operating time and improving the profitability. Besides, the improvement of service ability benefits the charging service providers' profitability, drivers' waiting time and the taxi leasing companies could fully enjoy the market expanding of business growth without the existing bottleneck of the Battery-Charging-Mode. Meanwhile, we find that the slow charge of Battery-Swapping-Mode causes less impact and less harmonic pollution to the power grid, extends the battery operation life, improves charging efficiency and reduces pollutant emission, which conducive the widespread application of electric vehicle in long-term development.
机译:随着能源效率的提高和碳排放量的减少,电动汽车(EV)的广泛应用成为许多运输系统中的大趋势。许多城市在公共交通系统中开始了电动公交和出租车的绿色能源革命。本文利用价值链分析和生命周期成本(LCC)来比较电池充电模式和电池交换模式电动出租车的运行可行性。提出了定量现金流量分析以评估两种不同模式的盈利能力。还计算了电池交换模式下慢速充电的排放减少量。通过分析和计算,发现电池交换模式在初始状态下需要大量投资来购买备用电池,但这将大大提高服务能力,这主要是由于释放了纯电动出租车的潜在运行时间并提高盈利能力。此外,服务能力的提高有利于充电服务提供商的盈利能力,驾驶员的等候时间,而出租车租赁公司可以充分享受业务增长的市场扩展,而没有现有的电池充电模式瓶颈。同时,我们发现慢速充电模式对电网的影响较小,对电网的谐波污染较小,延长了电池使用寿命,提高了充电效率,减少了污染物的排放,有利于电动汽车长期的广泛应用。长期发展。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号