First we start out with what is known of a landmark how well we know in orderto identifywhether it is the exact thing we are looking for (eg. entities; interactions;explanation;description; definition; qualifier quantifier - as building blocks).If the known (awareness) of beliefs available information about the thing isnot enough tomake a close examination, then we use the model search technique.We need to choose of combine the search for the identity of something by scopeof thesearch. Are you satisfied general/generic group or category versus a detail,customized,unique answer.ALTERNATIVE 1.First we could use an overview of the sought after thing's pattern ofattributes/connections/clues/linkages (1) types and 2) ranked strengths foreach (and alsothe 3) number for any of the attributes/connections/clues/linkages that leadto things -answers that have a high probability match (benchmarked against peers that mayor may nothave and if not probably worthwhile examining this thing and its uniquenessand itsrelationship to attributes/connections/clues/linkages (depending the same highprobabilitymatching to possibly the same types; number; and strengths; as peer thingsthat have thesame 3) characteristics would conclude the logical system/category that thesought afterthing's relative patterns of other comparable peers, organized by the logicalsystem that thesought thing is grouped under by category or singled out as different from theother membersof the logical system by differences in these 3) characteristics that can beeyeballed orguestimated.ALTERNATIVE 2.The model search technique also involves using the sought after thing's knowninformation(as a starting point) to use to trace viaattributes/connections/clues/linkages 1) to otherthings, whose own pattern of attributes/connections/clues/linkages 1) types 2)rankedstrengths 3) number of high probability matches for each of its ownattributes/connections/clues/linkages (benchmarked to examine for samepatterns of otherpeers in its group category - logical system), if this pattern(eyeballed/guesstimate/weighed)is recognizable as a strong two (or more leading to the same sought afteranswer) waysupporting the identity/existence and possibly overlapping involvement of eachother.ALTERNATIVE 3.Search down list of types of attributes/connections/clues/linkages that canlead torememberance of the sought after thing's identity and/or combination(s) ofattributes/connections/clues/linkages that match (by verified - recognition -awareness) thatthe answer sought possess these traits, especially where the multiplecombinations aremake a unique match. Traits include attributes/connections/clues/linkages aswell to thethings (they are connected to) with strong correlation such 1) types 2) rankedstrengths 3)number of high probability matches for each of its ownattributes/connections/clues/linkages(benchmarked to examine for same patterns of other peers in its group category- logicalsystem).In order to translate thoughts (neurons patterns) we could have thecomputer/ArtificialIntelligence or robots measure STRENGTH of Recognition, as the visualizationrolls out,possibly also the excitation that makes it roll out - and the sureness;knowing how the rightanswer is different (see above) from the wrong.In order to translate content (awareness of the system) we note the parts thatelicitresponses that is often used for recognition; by observing the brain'spatterns as it respondsto any of the factors (the parts that people's minds naturally notice and theorder ofobservation) below (separating each response from another - the difference inthe brain'spatterns at recognition and continued awareness of the parts' meanings - evenrecording thebrain's change in pattern as awareness of the part is degraded (especiallywhen learning hassaturated the mind - such as University Full Courses Load) and temporarilyforgotten andwhat cue is programmed to re-trigger the thought to come back in the future(eg. task - time- place) (as well we could when multitasking, differentiate between contentscontrolled byone part of the brain's patterns and another that control the other part, whenone thoughtperks up during a break in concentration from the other - eg. searching for amemory createsan empty slot in our contents that the other multitasked thought (or even asuppressedthought) may perk up in) we could use these techniques to read minds, anddevelop mind tomind contact (eg. over the internet GP 5%) allow Artificial Intelligence tocommunicate viathoughts even make a computer or television (Via AI or other console): projectpictures1. Pre formed important beliefs that touch a logical value nerve.2. Most attention stealing/capturing parts in real-time dynamic emotionalresponse).3. Why you value, your criterias, why you feel connection/emotional eg.logicalvalue, interesting, curiosity, nostalgia, sentimental, new (experience -curiosity)safety relative to sanity, entertainment such as understanding a story, wantto seefull story, cause/effect cliff hanger, who did it? And how it ends, passionate-veering towards what touches your heart except at times can be distracted whenloose your train of thought, engage in another thought; also important beliefsthattouch your heart eg. sports and/or outdoor activities.4. Principal parts size relative to humans or its other parts (whereobservable) criticalto overall operations also colour (patterns) that most appealing to theperson,catchy movements and sounds that appeal to the taste in general or at the timedepending on how fulfilled the person is at the time and their generalcompulsionspatterns of appetite through out the days, weeks, months...5. Changing and adding and putting aside important beliefs (that may becomeadded or replaced or altogether new) that touch a logical value nerve.Ultimately if we could create a database or Artificial Intelligence orcomputer algorithms, thatcan read healthy people's generic/general brain patterns of neurons firing foreveryrecognition, memory recognition - awareness - degradation - re-triggering,possiblycorrelated by tracing down the strength/sureness of answer pathway to a (ananswer) eg.picture or even objects, entities, interactions, qualifiers, quantifiers on acomputer screen orin real life, and reward the brain damaged victim when he (correct in timinglike a regularhealthy human) generates a better and better response to more and more like anormalhealthy human brain.We could also temporarily implant a microchip (or comprehensive brainelectrodes - or forthe gland at the back of the head) that pulses, or reads or both pulses (asreward - orstimulus) or reads (amplifies GP2%) the brains signals when the brain damagedvictimssenses the stimulus which is connected to a bunch of possibly stem cells andtissue culturedneurons outside the person's head. We can amplify the brain damaged person'ssound tostimulate the bunch of tissue cultured neurons which in turn are connected toa computerscreen or a stimulus in real life, the signals from the brain damaged person'sbrain eventuallycollaborate with the neurons from tissue culture to control and manipulate thecomputer. Weexpect that the stem cells and neurons tissue culture could eventually beinjected into theplace of the micro chip or taking the place of the damaged brain cells.The Artificial Intelligence could give feedback to guide/advise ask forclarification andverification as it reads a person's thoughts - mental collaborations betweenhumans, ArtificialIntelligences and computers all at the speed of thought. For humans, who aremore prone tomental mistakes their thoughts could be filtered, pre real-time feedback oftheircommunications/instructions/responses - eg. especially guarded secrets andemotionalresponses that might be offensive.
展开▼
