首页> 外文OA文献 >EFSA CEF Panel (EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes, Flavourings and Processing Aids), 2015. Scientific Opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 99 Revision 1 (FGE.99Rev1): Consideration of furanone derivatives evaluated by the JECFA (63rd, 65th and 69th meetings)
【2h】

EFSA CEF Panel (EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes, Flavourings and Processing Aids), 2015. Scientific Opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 99 Revision 1 (FGE.99Rev1): Consideration of furanone derivatives evaluated by the JECFA (63rd, 65th and 69th meetings)

机译:EFsa CEF专家组(EFsa食品接触材料,酶,调味剂和加工助剂专家组),2015年。关于调味品组评估的科学意见99修订版1(FGE.99Rev1):JECFa评估的呋喃酮衍生物的考虑(第63,65和69号)会议)

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes, Flavourings and Processing Aids (CEF) of the European Food Safety Authority was requested to consider evaluations of flavouring substances assessed since 2000 by the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (the JECFA), and to decide whether further evaluation is necessary, as laid down in Commission Regulation (EC) No 1565/2000. The substances were evaluated through a stepwise approach that integrates information on structure-activity relationships, intake from current uses, toxicological threshold of concern, and available data on metabolism and toxicity. The present consideration concerns a group of six furanone derivatives evaluated by the JECFA at their 63rd, 65th and 69th meetings. This revision of FGE.99 includes the assessment of the 2,5-dimethyl-4-methoxyfuran-3(2H)-one [FL-no: 13.089] cleared for genotoxicity concern compared to the previous version. The Panel concluded that none of the six substances gives rise to safety concerns at the levels of dietary intake, estimated on the basis of the MSDI approach [FL-nos: 13.010, 13.084, 13.085, 13.089, 13.099 and 13.176]. The specifications of the materials of commerce have also been considered and are adequate for all candidate substances in this FGE. However, for all substances use levels are required to calculate the mTAMDIs in order to identify those flavouring substances that need more refined exposure assessment and to finalise the evaluation.
机译:要求欧洲食品安全局食品接触材料,酶,调味剂和加工助剂小组(CEF)考虑对2000年以来粮农组织/世界卫生组织食品添加剂联合专家委员会(JECFA)评估的调味物质进行评估,以及根据委员会法规(EC)1565/2000号的规定,决定是否需要进一步评估。通过逐步方法对这些物质进行了评估,该方法综合了结构-活性关系,当前使用量,所关注的毒理学阈值以及有关代谢和毒性的可用数据的信息。目前的考虑涉及JECFA在其第六十三,第六十五和第六十九次会议上评估的六种呋喃酮衍生物。 FGE.99的修订版包括对2,5-二甲基-4-甲氧基呋喃3(2H)-1 [FL-no:13.089]的评估,该评估与以前的版本相比已消除了遗传毒性。专家组得出结论,根据MSDI方法[FL-nos:13.010、13.084、13.085、13.089、13.099和13.176]估算,这六种物质均未引起饮食摄入量方面的安全性问题。还已经考虑了商业材料的规格,对于该FGE中的所有候选物质均已足够。但是,对于所有物质,都需要使用水平来计算mTAMDI,以便识别需要更精细的暴露评估并最终完成评估的调味物质。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号