首页> 外文OA文献 >Power generation from chemically cleaned coals: do environmental benefits of firing cleaner coal outweigh environmental burden of cleaning?
【2h】

Power generation from chemically cleaned coals: do environmental benefits of firing cleaner coal outweigh environmental burden of cleaning?

机译:化学清洁煤的发电:燃烧清洁煤的环境效益是否超过环境清洁负担?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Power generation from high-ash coals is a niche technology for power generation, but coal cleaning is deemed necessary to avoid problems associated with low combustion efficiencies and to minimize environmental burdens associated with emissions of pollutants originating from ash. Here, chemical beneficiation of coals using acid and alkali–acid leaching procedures is evaluated as a potential coal cleaning technology employing life cycle assessment (LCA). Taking into account the environmental benefits from firing cleaner coal in pulverized coal power plants and the environmental burden of the cleaning itself, it is demonstrated that for a wide range of cleaning procedures and types of coal, chemical cleaning generally performs worse than combustion of the raw coals and physical cleaning using dense medium separation. These findings apply for many relevant impact categories, including climate change. Chemical cleaning can be optimized with regard to electricity, heat and methanol use for the hydrothermal washing step, and could have environmental impact comparable to that of physical cleaning if the overall resource intensiveness of chemical cleaning is reduced by a factor 5 to 10, depending on the impact category. The largest potential of the technology is observed for high-ash lignites, with initial ash content above 30%, for which the environmental benefits from firing cleaner coal can outweigh the environmental burden of cleaning for some impact categories. Overall, we recommend to policy makers that coal cleaning using acid or alkali–acid leaching procedures should not be considered for direct implementation as a coal beneficiation technology. We encourage further research on chemical cleaning and its optimization, however, as chemical cleaning has advantages that might make it attractive for cleaning of difficult to treat coals when compared to the less efficient option of physical cleaning.
机译:用高灰分煤发电是一种利基发电技术,但为了避免与低燃烧效率相关的问题并使与灰分产生的污染物排放相关的环境负担降至最低,煤炭清洁被认为是必要的。在这里,使用酸和碱-酸浸出程序对煤炭进行化学选矿被评估为一种采用生命周期评估(LCA)的潜在煤炭清洁技术。考虑到在粉煤发电厂中燃烧清洁煤炭会给环境带来的好处以及清洁本身的环境负担,事实证明,对于多种清洁程序和类型的煤炭,化学清洁的效果通常要比原料的燃烧差煤和物理清洁使用密集介质分离。这些发现适用于许多相关的影响类别,包括气候变化。可以在水热洗涤步骤中优化电力,热和甲醇使用方面的化学清洗,如果将化学清洗的总体资源密集度降低5到10倍,则对环境的影响可与物理清洗相当。影响类别。对于高灰分褐煤,初始灰分含量超过30%,观察到该技术的最大潜力,在某些影响类别下,燃烧更清洁的煤所产生的环境效益可能超过清洁的环境负担。总体而言,我们建议决策者不要将采用酸或碱-酸浸出程序进行的煤炭清洁作为煤炭选矿技术直接实施。我们鼓励对化学清洁及其优化进行进一步的研究,因为与物理清洁效率较低的选择相比,化学清洁具有的优势可能使其对难以处理的煤的清洁具有吸引力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号