首页> 外文OA文献 >Pooling of porcine fecal samples for quantification of Lawsonia intracellularis by real-time polymerase chain reaction
【2h】

Pooling of porcine fecal samples for quantification of Lawsonia intracellularis by real-time polymerase chain reaction

机译:通过实时聚合酶链反应汇集猪粪便样品以定量胞内劳森菌

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Procedures in which biological specimens are mixed and tested as 1 sample (pooling) have been applied for various biological specimens and laboratory examinations. The objective of the current study was to investigate agreement between laboratory testing of fecal pools and theoretical values obtained by averaging test results from individual fecal samples in relation to a quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) test for Lawsonia intracellularis. Ten diarrheic and 10 normal fecal samples were submitted from each of 43 Danish swine herds (n = 860 fecal samples). Pools (n = 43), each containing 20 individual fecal samples from the same herd, were prepared in the laboratory by pooling 10% fecal phosphate buffered saline solutions. All pools and individual fecal samples were subjected to qPCR testing for L. intracellularis. The theoretical number of L. intracellularis in the pools was calculated as the mean number of bacteria from the 20 individual fecal samples contributing to each pool. Agreement between the laboratory testing of pools and theoretical calculations based on individual sample results was evaluated. Pooling resulted in fewer L. intracellularis–positive herds (41.9%) compared with testing 20 fecal samples (53.5%). Agreement between the laboratory and the theoretical pools for dichotomized test results was 100% (95% confidence interval: 91.8–100%). For the quantitative test results, Lin concordance correlation coefficient was 0.997. The mean difference between the laboratory testing and the theoretical values was not different from zero (mean difference = 0.039 log10 bacteria/g feces; P = 0.26).
机译:将生物样本混合并作为1个样本进行测试(合并)的程序已用于各种生物样本和实验室检查。本研究的目的是调查粪便池的实验室测试与理论值之间的一致性,该理论值是通过将单个粪便样品的测试结果与胞内劳森菌定量聚合酶链反应(qPCR)测试相关的平均值得到的。从43个丹麦猪群中分别提交了10个腹泻样品和10个正常粪便样品(n = 860个粪便样品)。在实验室中,通过合并10%的粪便磷酸盐缓冲盐溶液,制备了每个样本池(n = 43),每个样本池包含来自同一群的20个粪便样品。对所有合并物和单个粪便样品进行细胞内劳森氏菌的qPCR测试。计算池中胞内劳森氏菌的理论数,作为贡献于每个池的20个单独粪便样品中细菌的平均数。评估了池的实验室测试与基于单个样本结果的理论计算之间的一致性。与测试20个粪便样本(53.5%)相比,合并可减少胞内劳森氏菌阳性牛群(41.9%)。实验室和二分法化验结果的理论库之间的一致性为100%(95%置信区间:91.8-100%)。对于定量测试结果,Lin一致性相关系数为0.997。实验室测试与理论值之间的平均差异不为零(平均值差异= 0.039 log10细菌/克粪便; P = 0.26)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号