首页> 外文OA文献 >Microbial Enhanced Oil Recovery - Advanced Reservoir Simulation
【2h】

Microbial Enhanced Oil Recovery - Advanced Reservoir Simulation

机译:微生物强化采油 - 先进的油藏模拟

摘要

In this project, a generic model has been set up to include the two main mechanisms in the microbial enhanced oil recovery (MEOR) process; reduction of the interfacial tension (IFT) due to surfactant production, and microscopic fluid diversion as a part of the overall fluid diversion mechanism due to formation of biofilm. The construction of a one-dimensional simulator enables us to investigate how the different mechanisms and the combination of these influence the displacement processes, the saturation profiles and thus the oil recovery curves. The reactive transport model describes convection, bacterial growth, substrate consumption, and surfactant production in one dimension. The system comprises oil, water, bacteria, substrate, and surfactant. There are two flowing phases: Water and oil. We introduce the partition of surfactant between these two phases determined by a partitioning constant. Another effect is attachment of the bacteria to the pore walls and formation of biofilm. It leads to reduction of porosity and, under some assumptions, to increase the fraction of oil in the flow. Surfactant is our key component in order to reduce IFT. The surfactant concentration in the water phase must reach a certain concentration threshold, before it can reduce the interfacial tension and, thus, the residual oil saturation. The relative permeabilities depend on the water phase concentration, so when surfactant is moved into the oil phase, the effect from the surfactant on the oil production is reduced. Therefore, the transfer part of the surfactant to oil phase is equivalent to its “disappearance”. The oil phase captures the surfactant, but it may as well be adsorbed to the pore walls in the oil phase. We have looked into three methods how to translate the IFT reduction into changes of the relative permeabilities. Overall, these methods produce similar results. Separate investigations of the surfactant effect have been performed through exemplifying simulation cases, where no biofilm is formed. The water phase saturation profiles are found to contain a waterfront initially following the saturation profile for pure waterflooding. At the oil mobilization point -- where the surfactant effect starts to take place -- a sufficient surfactant concentration has been built up in order to mobilize the residual oil. A second waterfront is produced, and an oil bank is created. The recovery curve consists of several parts. Initially, the recovery curve follows pure waterflooding recovery until breakthrough of the oil bank. The next part of the recovery curve continues until breakthrough of the second waterfront. The incline is still relatively steep due to a low water cut. In the last part, the curve levels off. Partitioning of surfactant between the oil and water phase is a novel effect in the context of microbial enhanced oil recovery. The partitioning coefficient determines the time lag before the surfactant effect can be seen. The surfactant partitioning does not change final recovery, but a smaller partitioning coefficient gives a larger time lag before the same maximum recovery is reached. However, if too little surfactant stays in the water phase, we cannot obtain the surfactant effect. The final recovery depends on the distance from the inlet to the oil mobilization point. Additionally, it depends on, how much the surfactant-induced IFT reduction lowers the residual oil. The surfactant effect position is sensitive to changes in growth rate, and injection concentrations of bacteria and substrate, which then determine the final recovery. Variations in growth rate and injection concentration also affect the time lag until mobilization of residual oil occurs. Additionally, the final recovery depends on, how much the surfactant-induced interfacial tension reduction lowers the residual oil saturation. The effects of the efficiency of surfactants are also investigated. A super efficient surfactant produces an incremental recovery recovery around 40 % OOIP over that of waterflooding. Application of the less efficient -- and probably more realistic -- surfactant results in an incremental oil recovery of 9 % OOIP, but it is still considered a significant improvement. The bacteria may adhere to the pore walls and form a biofilm phase. The bacteria distribution between the water and biofilm phase is modeled by the Langmuir expression, which depends on the bacteria concentration in the water phase. The surface available for adsorption is scaled by the water saturation, as bacteria only adsorb from the water phase. The biofilm formation implies that the concentration of bacteria near the inlet increases. In combination with surfactant production, the biofilm results in a higher surfactant concentration in the initial part of the reservoir. The oil that is initially bypassed in connection with the surfactant effect, can be recovered as formation of biofilm shortens the distance from the inlet to the point of oil mobilization. The effect of biofilm formation on the displacement profiles and on the recovery is studied in the present work. Formation of biofilm also leads to porosity reduction, which is coupled to modification of permeability. This promotes the fluid diversion mechanism. A contribution to fluid diversion mechanism is microscopic fluid diversion, which is possible to investigate in a one-dimensional system. The relative permeability for water is modified according to our modified version of the Kozeny-Carman equation. Bacteria only influence the water and biofilm phases directly, so the oil phase remains the same. We have assessed the effect from biofilm formation together with microscopic fluid diversion. When sufficient amount of surfactant is produced in the water phase, the effect from surfactant generates a larger contribution to recovery compared to microscopic fluid diversion. To study the MEOR performance in multiple dimensions, the one-dimensional model with the surfactant effect alone has been implemented into existing simulators; a streamline simulator and a finite difference simulator. In the streamline simulator, the effect of gravity is introduced using an operator splitting technique. The gravity effect stabilizes oil displacement causing markedly improvement of the oil recovery, when the oil density becomes relatively low. The general characteristics found for MEOR in one-dimensional simulations are also demonstrated both in two and three dimensions. Overall, this MEOR process conducted in a heterogeneous reservoir also produces more oil compared to waterflooding, when the simulations are run in multiple dimensions. The work presented in this thesis has resulted in two publications so far.
机译:在该项目中,已经建立了一个通用模型,其中包括微生物强化采油(MEOR)过程中的两个主要机制。由于表面活性剂的产生降低了界面张力(IFT),并且由于形成了生物膜而使微观流体转移成为整体流体转移机制的一部分。一维仿真器的构建使我们能够研究不同的机理以及这些机理的组合如何影响驱替过程,饱和度剖面以及油采收曲线。反应性传输模型在一个维度上描述了对流,细菌生长,底物消耗和表面活性剂的产生。该系统包括油,水,细菌,底物和表面活性剂。有两个流动阶段:水和油。我们介绍了由分配常数确定的表面活性剂在这两相之间的分配。另一个作用是细菌附着在孔壁上并形成生物膜。在某些假设下,它会导致孔隙率降低,并增加流中油的份额。表面活性剂是我们降低IFT的关键成分。水相中的表面活性剂浓度必须达到一定的浓度阈值,然后才能降低界面张力,从而降低残余油饱和度。相对渗透率取决于水相浓度,因此当表面活性剂移入油相时,表面活性剂对产油量的影响会降低。因此,表面活性剂向油相的转移部分相当于其“消失”。油相捕获了表面活性剂,但它也可能被吸附到油相的孔壁中。我们已经研究了三种将IFT降低转化为相对渗透率变化的方法。总体而言,这些方法产生相似的结果。通过举例说明没有形成生物膜的模拟情况,对表面活性剂的效果进行了单独的研究。发现水相饱和度剖面最初在纯水驱的饱和度剖面之后包含海滨。在集油点(开始发生表面活性剂作用)处,已经建立了足够的表面活性剂浓度,以移动残留油。产生了第二条滨水区,并建立了一个石油库。恢复曲线由几部分组成。最初,采收率曲线遵循纯注水采收率,直到油层突破为止。恢复曲线的下一部分一直持续到第二个滨水区突破为止。由于含水率低,该倾斜度仍然相对陡峭。在最后一部分中,曲线趋于平稳。在微生物提高油采收率的背景下,在油和水相之间分配表面活性剂是一种新颖的作用。分配系数决定了在看到表面活性剂效果之前的时间滞后。表面活性剂的分配不会改变最终的回收率,但是分配系数越小,在达到相同的最大回收率之前,时间间隔越大。但是,如果表面活性剂残留在水相中太少,我们将无法获得表面活性剂的效果。最终的回收率取决于从入口到集油点的距离。另外,这取决于表面活性剂引起的IFT降低能降低残留油量的多少。表面活性剂的作用位置对生长速率以及细菌和底物的注射浓度的变化敏感,然后决定最终的回收率。增长率和注入浓度的变化也会影响到剩余油动员之前的时间滞后。另外,最终的回收率取决于表面活性剂引起的界面张力降低多少会降低残余油饱和度。还研究了表面活性剂效率的影响。与注水相比,超高效表面活性剂的采收率可提高约40%OOIP。使用效率较低(可能更现实)的表面活性剂可使油回收率提高9%OOIP,但仍被认为是一项重大改进。细菌可能粘附在孔壁上并形成生物膜相。水和生物膜相之间的细菌分布由Langmuir表达式建模,该表达式取决于水相中细菌的浓度。由于细菌仅从水相吸附,因此可用于吸附的表面会根据水的饱和度进行缩放。生物膜的形成意味着入口附近细菌的浓度增加。与表面活性剂生产相结合,生物膜在储层的初始部分导致较高的表面活性剂浓度。最初因表面活性剂作用而被旁路的油可以被回收,因为生物膜的形成缩短了从入口到动油点的距离。在目前的工作中,研究了生物膜形成对位移剖面和恢复的影响。生物膜的形成还导致孔隙率降低,这与渗透率的改变有关。这促进了流体转移机制。流体分流机制的一个贡献是微观流体分流,可以在一维系统中进行研究。根据我们的Kozeny-Carman方程的修改版本,修改了水的相对渗透率。细菌仅直接影响水相和生物膜相,因此油相保持不变。我们已经评估了生物膜形成以及微观液体转移的影响。当在水相中产生足够量的表面活性剂时,与微观流体分流相比,表面活性剂的作用对回收率的贡献更大。为了研究多维的MEOR性能,仅将表面活性剂效应的一维模型已应用到现有的模拟器中。流线型模拟器和有限差分模拟器。在流线型模拟器中,使用算子拆分技术引入了重力效应。当油的密度变得相对较低时,重力效应使油的驱替稳定,从而显着改善了油的采收率。一维模拟中发现的MEOR的一般特征也可以在二维和三维中得到证明。总的来说,当在多个维度上进行模拟时,与注水相比,在非均质油藏中进行的MEOR过程还会产生更多的石油。迄今为止,本论文提出的工作已发表了两篇。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号