首页> 外文OA文献 >Spatio-temporal use of the urban habitat by feral pigeons (Columba livia)
【2h】

Spatio-temporal use of the urban habitat by feral pigeons (Columba livia)

机译:野鸽对城市栖息地的时空使用(Columba livia)

摘要

Despite the large number of feral pigeons and their proximity to humans, their use of theudurban habitat is not entirely understood. Previous studies have given various results aboutudthe home range of feral pigeons and their temporal activity patterns. The aim of our study isudto clarify the situation for Basel and to compare it to other cities. For this purpose, weudadapted the global positioning system (GPS) to use it for the first time with feral pigeons.udIn a first step, we tested the suitability of this method for studying the spatio-temporal use ofudthe urban habitat by feral pigeons. Despite some problems due to the highly structured urbanudhabitat such as poor satellite signal reception in the street canyons, and technical limitationsudsuch as short battery life, the method revealed itself to be very suitable.udIn a second step, we studied the behaviour of 80 free-ranging feral pigeons living in threeudlofts situated in the city of Basel.udIn our study, we could prove that pigeons follow individual strategies in using the urbanudhabitat. Some birds covered only short distances (300–500 m), others flew to surroundingudagricultural areas 5 km away from the loft. On average, pigeons in Basel covered longeruddistances than pigeons in many other cities. These differences may partially be due to theudmethod applied. Contrary to other methods, GPS-tracking records all displacements. Theuddifferences probably also depend on the availability and distribution of food resources in theudcities. The pigeons of each loft visited one or two principal feeding places, but used alsoudother places on a less regularly basis. The pigeons showed flexible behaviour that enablesudthem to adapt to different situations. Pigeons are not dependent on feeding in the vicinity ofudtheir sleeping or breeding places, as stated by some authors. Our results show that they areudable to fly a few kilometres to search for food. Death from starvation is, therefore, not audvaluable argument against pigeon control campaigns which are based on reduction ofudintentional feeding. Our findings are also important for biomonitoring projects using feraludpigeons. For statements about pollution indicated by this species, it is generally assumedudthat they show a limited mobility in the city. Our results prove that this is not always the caseudand that the use of the urban habitat must be verified for each project.udIn our study, females covered longer distances than males. Reproduction is much moreudenergy consuming for females than for males. Females also have problems competing forudfood with the stronger males. We therefore believe that females preferred flying longeruddistances to reach more abundant and reliable food sources.udThe home ranges differed between the lofts but showed an overlap at some feeding places.udDiseases and parasites can therefore be transmitted from one subpopulation to another andudspread over the entire city. This is of human concern, since at least seven infectiousuddiseases can be transmitted from pigeons to humans.udOn average, pigeons spent 31.3% of the day outside the lofts. This percentage variedudaccording to breeding state and season. Breeding pigeons spent less time outside than nonbreedingudpigeons or pigeons rearing young and had a different temporal activity pattern.udBreeding is a constraint to pigeon life, not only because it is time consuming, but alsoudbecause temporarily restricted food resources can no longer be exploited by one pigeon ofudthe breeding pair.udEven during short winter days, pigeons spent on average only 28.5% of the day outside. Dayudlength is therefore not a limitation to finding enough food. In autumn, the pigeons spent moreudtime outside than in any other season. We found no correlation with the day length or theudpercentage of breeding birds. We suppose that the pigeons must replenish their fat reservesudafter the energy consuming breeding season, as well as moult, and that they therefore spendudmore time foraging. The evolution of pigeons’ weight over the seasons reinforces thisudhypothesis. The weight was highest in winter, decreased during spring and summer andudincreased again in autumn.udDuring this study, females spent more time outside the lofts than males. We suppose thatudmales must spend more time in the lofts to defend their territories. As stated above, femalesududalso have problems competing with the stronger males for food at unnaturally concentratedudfood sources that are typical for cities. The longer periods of time spent outside may reflectudtheir difficulty to gain access to food.udBefore starting pigeon control campaigns, it is important to know the size of the population.udCensus counts are best undertaken when most pigeons have left their sleeping or breedingudplaces. Our results show that, in Basel, the best time for counts is in the early afternoon,udbetween 12:00 and 14:00, when, on average, 60–70% of the pigeons are outside.udTo sum up, the GPS method allowed us to gather detailed information on the individual useudof the urban habitat by feral pigeons. These findings are important for the three practicaludapplications: biomonitoring with feral pigeons, understanding of transmission of diseases,udand pigeon control campaigns.
机译:尽管野生鸽子数量众多并且与人类亲近,但他们对城市居所的使用仍未完全了解。先前的研究给出了有关野鸽的居所范围及其时间活动模式的各种结果。我们的研究目的是 u弄清巴塞尔的局势,并将其与其他城市进行比较。为此,我们已将全球定位系统(GPS)首次用于野鸽。 ud第一步,我们测试了该方法对研究城市栖息地时空使用的适用性。由野鸽。尽管由于高度结构化的城市居住环境(例如,街道峡谷中卫星信号接收不良)和技术限制(例如电池寿命短)等问题,该方法仍然非常适合。 ud第二步,我们研究了居住在巴塞尔市三个 udloft内的80只自由放养野鸽的行为。 ud在我们的研究中,我们可以证明鸽子在使用城市 udhabitat时遵循个体策略。一些鸟只飞近距离(300-500 m),其他鸟则飞到离鸽舍5公里的周围农业地区。平均而言,巴塞尔的鸽子比其他许多城市的鸽子更长的距离。这些差异可能部分归因于所应用的 udmethod。与其他方法相反,GPS跟踪会记录所有位移。差异还可能取决于城市中粮食资源的可用性和分布。每个鸽舍的鸽子都探访了一个或两个主要的饲养场所,但也很少使用其他场所。鸽子表现出灵活的行为,使他们能够适应不同的情况。正如一些作者所说,鸽子不依赖于睡觉或繁殖场所附近的食物。我们的结果表明,他们可以飞行几公里以寻找食物。因此,对于饥饿控制造成的死亡,反对基于减少有意喂养的鸽子控制运动不是一个可以估量的论点。我们的发现对于使用野生鸽子的生物监测项目也很重要。对于有关该物种表示的污染的陈述,通常假定 ud表明它们在城市中活动受限。我们的结果证明,情况并非总是如此。 ud,每个项目都必须验证城市栖息地的使用。 ud在我们的研究中,女性比男性的距离更长。雌性繁殖比雄性消耗更多的能源。雌性与强壮的雄性竞争 udfood也有问题。因此,我们认为雌性更喜欢飞行更长的距离以达到更丰富和可靠的食物来源。ud鸽舍之间的家养范围有所不同,但在某些饲养场所显示出重叠。因此,疾病和寄生虫可以从一个亚群传播到另一个亚群。 遍及整个城市。这是人类关注的问题,因为至少有7种传染性疾病可从鸽子传播给人类。平均而言,鸽子每天在鸽舍外度过的时间为31.3%。该百分比根据繁殖状态和季节而变化。繁殖的鸽子在外面花费的时间少于非繁殖的 udpigeons或幼鸽并具有不同的时间活动模式。 ud繁殖限制了鸽子的生命,不仅因为它很费时间,而且因为暂时受限制的食物资源不再 ud即使在较短的冬季,鸽子平均每天只在户外度过28.5%的时间。因此,白天/阴天不是寻找足够食物的限制。在秋天,鸽子在户外度过的闲暇时间比任何其他季节都多。我们发现与种鸡的日长或%没有任何关系。我们认为,鸽子必须在能量消耗旺盛的季节之后以及换羽后补充其脂肪储备,因此他们要花费更多的时间进行觅食。鸽子体重随季节的变化加剧了这种假说。体重在冬季最高,在春季和夏季有所下降,在秋季再次增加。 ud在这项研究中,雌性在阁楼外的时间比雄性多。我们认为 ududmales必须在鸽舍里花费更多的时间来捍卫自己的领土。如上所述,女性 ud ud在以城市为代表的非自然集中 udfood来源与较强的男性竞争食物方面也存在问题。在户外度过的较长时间可能反映出他们获得食物的困难。 ud在开始赛鸽控制运动之前,了解种群数量非常重要。 ud普查计数最好在大多数赛鸽离开睡眠或睡觉时进行。繁殖地方。我们的结果表明,在巴塞尔,最好的清点时间是在下午凌晨 12:00至14:00之间,平均总的来说,有60–70%的鸽子在室外。 ud概括地说,GPS方法使我们能够收集野生鸽子对城市栖息地个人用途的详细信息。这些发现对于三个实用的应用非常重要:野生鸽子的生物监测,疾病传播的理解,鸽子的控制运动。

著录项

  • 作者

    Rose Eva;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2005
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号