首页> 外文OA文献 >Textile and clothing industry competitiveness in the Southern African region
【2h】

Textile and clothing industry competitiveness in the Southern African region

机译:纺织服装业在南部非洲地区的竞争力

摘要

This is a study of the relationship between approaches to people management and competitiveness, by examining the case of the textile and clothing industry in Southern Africa. The textile and clothing industry has historically played a major role in many national economies (including many southern African countries) contributing not only to overall economic growth, but also to the creation of significant numbers of relatively well-paid jobs. In the Southern African Region (SAR), the textile and clothing industry has undergone many structural pressures in the face of increased cheap imports from South-East Asian countries – above all, China and Bangladesh - which have resulted in the closure of many firms, and the significant downsizing of many survivors. This study seeks to explore the relationship between HR practice and organizational sustainability in the textile and clothing industry in Southern Africa region, with a particular emphasis on the cases of three countries: South Africa, Mauritius and the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Whilst at very different stages of national development, and with distinct political and developmental histories, all three countries were subject to active industrial policies, including the development of national clothing and textile industries. Again, all have faced the challenge of sustaining these industries in the face of liberalization and intensive competition from the Far East. This study is based on a multi-method approach, combining in-depth interviews with national industry surveys, and the usage of relevant documentary sources. It takes cognizance of the increasing relevance of new HRM practices and discourses to the growing field of Development Studies in the 21st century. The existing HRM literature suggests that there are a number of alternative people management strategies through which firms may secure their competitiveness, most notably strategic approaches to hard HRM (which treats people as an instrument to be strategically deployed to promote competitiveness), soft HRM (which promotes cooperative approaches to managing people) and traditional labour repression (managing people simply as a cost, to be managed in a short-term, un-strategic manner). The literature on HRM in Africa has suggested an alternative paradigm, which combines autocratic paternalism with elements of communitarianism. This study found that the bulk of firms encompassed by the study employed HR policies that recognizably fell within the soft HRM paradigm, enabling high value added production. However, an important exception lies in the area of security of tenure: firms tended to combine high levels of employee involvement and participation; as well as a commitment to human resource development, along with a persistent reliance on the usage of redundancies to adjust changes in the relative need for labour. Hence, this study highlights the limitations of theoretical approaches which see HR strategies as being necessarily coherent and self-reinforcing. Firms may broadly adhere to one approach, whilst adopting aspects of another as needs arise and in response to external pressures. An important exception to this was Mauritius, in which security of tenure appeared to be stronger, perhaps owing to the greater ease of enforcing regulations against illegal imports in a relatively small island country by allowing firms to plan for the future with greater confidence. In contrast, firms in South Africa were characterized by much lower security of tenure, against a backdrop of declining profits, reflecting the competitive challenges posed not only by legitimate low cost imports, but also illegal imports and the proliferation of rural sweatships. One again, this study highlights the relative fragility of the position of many firms and the continued importance of governmental support, most notably in terms of export incentives, support and facilitation in the adoption of new technologies, as well as better policing against illegal imports.
机译:通过研究南部非洲的纺织和制衣业案例,这是对人员管理方法与竞争力之间关系的研究。历史上,纺织和服装业在许多国家经济中(包括许多南部非洲国家)起着重要作用,不仅对整体经济增长做出了贡献,而且还为创造大量相对较高的薪水工作做出了贡献。在南部非洲地区(SAR),面对来自东南亚国家(尤其是中国和孟加拉国)的廉价进口商品增加,纺织服装业遭受了许多结构性压力,这导致许多公司倒闭,以及许多幸存者的大幅缩编。这项研究旨在探讨南部非洲地区纺织服装行业中人力资源实践与组织可持续性之间的关系,特别着重于三个国家的案例:南非,毛里求斯和刚果民主共和国。虽然处于不同的国家发展阶段,具有不同的政治和发展历史,但所有三个国家都受到积极的产业政策的制约,包括发展民族服装和纺织工业。再次,在自由化和来自远东的激烈竞争中,所有人都面临着维持这些产业的挑战。这项研究基于多方法方法,将深度访谈与国家行业调查相结合,并结合了相关文献资料的使用。它认识到新的人力资源管理实践和论述与21世纪发展研究领域的日益增长的相关性。现有的人力资源管理文献表明,存在许多可供选择的人员管理策略,企业可以通过这些策略来确保自身的竞争力,其中最显着的策略是采用硬性人力资源管理(将人员作为战略​​手段来提高竞争力的手段),软性人力资源管理(促进合作管理人员的方法)和传统的劳动压制(简单地将人员管理作为一种成本,以短期,非战略性的方式进行管理)。关于非洲人力资源管理的文献提出了一种替代范式,它将专制家长式制与社群主义的要素相结合。这项研究发现,研究涵盖的大多数公司都采用了公认的人力资源政策,这些政策明显属于软人力资源管理范式,可以实现高附加值的生产。但是,一个重要的例外是保有权保障方面:公司倾向于将高水平的员工参与和参与结合在一起;以及对人力资源开发的承诺,以及对裁员的持续依赖,以调整相对劳动力需求的变化。因此,本研究突出了理论方法的局限性,后者认为人力资源战略必定是连贯和自我强化的。企业可以广泛地遵循一种方法,同时根据需要并根据外部压力采用另一种方法。毛里求斯的一个重要例外是,保有权的保障似乎更强,这可能是由于在一个相对较小的岛国中,通过允许企业更加有信心地制定未来计划,更容易执行针对非法进口的法规。相反,在利润下降的背景下,南非公司的特点是保有权保障要低得多,这不仅反映了合法合法进口,非法进口以及农村汗水泛滥带来的竞争挑战。这项研究再次强调了许多公司地位的相对脆弱性以及政府支持的持续重要性,特别是在采用新技术方面的出口激励,支持和便利以及对非法进口的更好治安方面。

著录项

  • 作者

    Mwamayi Kibunji Adam;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2013
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 English
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号