首页> 外文OA文献 >Variation in Patient Profiles and Outcomes in US and Non-US Subgroups of the Cangrelor Versus Standard Therapy to Achieve Optimal Management of Platelet Inhibition (CHAMPION) PHOENIX Trial
【2h】

Variation in Patient Profiles and Outcomes in US and Non-US Subgroups of the Cangrelor Versus Standard Therapy to Achieve Optimal Management of Platelet Inhibition (CHAMPION) PHOENIX Trial

机译:美国和非美国Cangrelor亚组与标准治疗的患者概况和结果的变化,以实现血小板抑制的最佳管理(CHampION)pHOENIX试验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background—The Cangrelor Versus Standard Therapy to Achieve Optimal Management of Platelet Inhibition (CHAMPION) PHOENIX trial demonstrated superiority of cangrelor in reducing ischemic events at 48 hours in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention compared with clopidogrel. Methods and Results—We analyzed all patients included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis in US (n=4097; 37.4%) and non-US subgroups (n=6845; 62.6%). The US cohort was older, had a higher burden of cardiovascular risk factors, and had more frequently undergone prior cardiovascular procedures. US patients more frequently underwent percutaneous coronary intervention for stable angina (77.9% versus 46.2%). Almost all US patients (99.1%) received clopidogrel loading doses of 600 mg, whereas 40.5% of non-US patients received 300 mg. Bivalirudin was more frequently used in US patients (56.7% versus 2.9%). At 48 hours, rates of the primary composite end point were comparable in the US and non-US cohorts (5.5% versus 5.2%; P=0.53). Cangrelor reduced rates of the primary composite end point compared with clopidogrel in US (4.5% versus 6.4%; odds ratio 0.70 [95% confidence interval 0.53–0.92]) and in non-US patients (4.8% versus 5.6%; odds ratio 0.85 [95% confidence interval 0.69–1.05]; interaction P=0.26). Similarly, rates of the key secondary end point, stent thrombosis, were reduced by cangrelor in both regions. Rates of Global Use of Strategies to Open Occluded Arteries (GUSTO)–defined severe bleeding were low and not significantly increased by cangrelor in either region. Conclusions—Despite broad differences in clinical profiles and indications for percutaneous coronary intervention by region in a large global cardiovascular clinical trial, cangrelor consistently reduced rates of ischemic end points compared with clopidogrel without an excess in severe bleeding in both the US and non-US subgroups.
机译:背景— Cangrelor与实现最佳血小板抑制管理的标准疗法(CHAMPION)的PHOENIX试验证明,与氯吡格雷相比,cangrelor在减少48小时经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的缺血事件方面具有优势。方法和结果—我们分析了美国(n = 4097; 37.4%)和非美国亚组(n = 6845; 62.6%)纳入改良后的意向治疗分析的所有患者。美国队列年龄较大,心血管疾病危险因素负担更大,并且以前接受过心血管手术的频率更高。美国患者更常接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗以治疗稳定型心绞痛(分别为77.9%和46.2%)。几乎所有美国患者(99.1%)接受的氯吡格雷负荷剂量为600 mg,而非美国患者中有40.5%的患者接受300 mg。比伐卢定在美国患者中使用频率更高(56.7%对2.9%)。在48小时时,主要复合终点的发生率在美国和非美国人群中相当(5.5%对5.2%; P = 0.53)。在美国和非美国患者中,坎格雷洛与氯吡格雷相比,主要复合终点的发生率(4.5%比6.4%;优势比0.70 [95%置信区间0.53–0.92])和非美国患者(4.8%比5.6%;优势比0.85) [95%置信区间0.69-1.05];交互作用P = 0.26)。同样,坎格雷洛在两个地区均降低了主要次要终点,支架血栓形成的发生率。 Cangrelor在这两个地区中使用全球开放性闭塞动脉策略(GUSTO)定义的严重出血的发生率较低,并且没有显着增加。结论—尽管在一项大型的全球心血管临床试验中,按区域进行的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的临床概况和适应症差异很大,但在美国和非美国亚组中,cangrelor与氯吡格雷相比仍持续降低了缺血终点的发生率,而没有发生严重出血。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号