首页> 外文OA文献 >The Effect of Applying Alternate IPCC Climate Scenarios to Marine Reserve Design for Range Changing Species
【2h】

The Effect of Applying Alternate IPCC Climate Scenarios to Marine Reserve Design for Range Changing Species

机译:IpCC气候交替方案应用于变距物种海洋保护区设计的效果

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Effectively protecting of biodiversity in the future relies on reserves that accommodate potential climate change impacts. Climate predictions are based on plausible ranges of greenhouse gas concentration scenarios from the IPCC, called Representative Concentration Pathways (RCPs). It is unknown how different scenarios influence spatial prioritization, particularly for species that change their range due to climate change. Using corals in Japan, we explore differences in priorities under three RCPs (RCP8.5, 4.5, and 2.6), comparing three time frames (current conditions, near future, and distant future). We targeted three temperature zones representing different coral community types, determined from predictions of sea-surface temperature for three RCPs. Results showed that using one RCP prediction to design a reserve system does a poor job at meeting conservation targets for other RCPs, missing up to 100% of the targets. We emphasize the importance of focusing conservation investment in “no regrets” areas that are important under every RCP.
机译:未来要有效地保护生物多样性,就要依靠能够适应潜在气候变化影响的储备。气候预测基于IPCC的温室气体浓度情景的合理范围,即所谓的代表浓度路径(RCP)。尚不清楚不同场景如何影响空间优先次序,特别是对于由于气候变化而改变其范围的物种。我们使用日本的珊瑚,研究了三个RCP(RCP8.5、4.5和2.6)下优先级的差异,并比较了三个时间范围(当前状况,不久的将来和遥远的将来)。我们针对三个代表不同珊瑚群落类型的温度带,以三个RCP的海面温度的预测确定。结果表明,使用一个RCP预测来设计储备系统在实现其他RCP保护目标方面做得很差,最多达不到目标的100%。我们强调将保护投资集中在每个RCP都重要的“无悔”领域的重要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号