首页> 外文OA文献 >The perspectives of older people and GPs on depression in later life and its management : the stories they tell and ways they respond to each other
【2h】

The perspectives of older people and GPs on depression in later life and its management : the stories they tell and ways they respond to each other

机译:老年人和全科医生对晚年抑郁症及其管理的看法:他们讲述的故事以及他们互相回应的方式

摘要

Depression in older people is under recognized and under treated in primary care. This is despite symptoms being similar across the lifespan and many older people with depression regularly seeing their general practitioner (GP). Problems specific to its management set it apart from depression in younger people, and include both disparities in the way older people and GPs perceive depression and a shared view that it is a normal part of aging, as well as barriers to the way older people talk about it and the help GPs provide. This evidence indicates a lack of understanding about the ways both groups perceive depression, and how their different situations, positions and needs may influence what they say and do and ways they respond to each other in consultations. The research aim is therefore to explore how older people’s and GPs’ different positions and situations influence the ways they perceive depression. Particular focus is on influences reported by older people over ways they talk about depression and influences reported by GPs over ways they respond. In doing this the study seeks practical solutions to help GPs identify depression in older people and provide them with appropriate help. The methodology and methods of this study are informed by a recent version of grounded theory, Situational Analysis (Clarke, 2005), which is philosophically orientated between symbolic interactionism and social constructionism. Clarke (2005) builds on the work of Strauss and Corbin (1998), assuming a social constructionist approach to grounded theory to enable exploration of how people’s views are formed and how this influences their actions. Theory can be generated and located within changing and multi-faceted contexts by considering the wider situations of both the researcher and the researched and looking at the data from multiple perspectives such as historical, geographical and biographical. Semi structured interviews were conducted with older people and GPs as the main form of data, with the researcher’s (IG’s) observations of interviews as contextual data. Using this approach a theoretical model has been developed to explain how older people and GPs operate in consultations for depression, proposing how different types of older people and GPs are likely to respond to each other. The stories older people report telling about their depression and the ways GPs report responding show the “porous” and “flexible” (Clarke, 2005, p.111) positions they can take in consultations: the interview data suggests that older people can move between stages of understanding and accepting their depression, and GPs can move between styles of working and employ different combinations of skills in response to older people’s stories. This element of change is key to the findings of this study and indicates the fluidity of their positions, where they change depending on what they perceive to be influences over them at the time. This study highlights the importance of recognizing differences between ways older people and GPs operate in consultations and the different factors that influence ways they respond to each other. It suggests how GPs working in different styles might help older people based on the different ways they tell their stories, and a key message is that GPs who can adapt their skills to those needs are likely to be most successful in managing it. For example some older people may need GPs to help them make sense of their problems before they will accept treatment or therapy for depression and others may need GPs to take the lead on decisions when they are at rock bottom. The theoretical model suggests how GPs can quickly identify depression in older people and the stage of depression they are at by the stories they tell, and how they might adapt their skills in response to provide them with the most appropriate help. This is intended as a step towards understanding the reasons underlying what happens in consultations for depression in later life, and finding solutions for problems existing in its management.
机译:老年人的抑郁症在初级保健中未得到认可和治疗。尽管症状在整个生命周期中都是相似的,并且许多患有抑郁症的老年人经常去看普通科医生(GP)。其管理所特有的问题使它与年轻人的抑郁症区分开来,包括老年人和全科医生对抑郁症的看法方面的差异,以及人们普遍认为这是衰老的正常部分,以及阻碍老年人说话的障碍。关于它以及GP提供的帮助。这些证据表明,对于这两个群体对抑郁症的理解方式,他们的不同处境,职位和需求可能如何影响他们所说的话和所做的事情以及他们在磋商中如何相互反应的方式,缺乏了解。因此,该研究的目的是探索老年人和全科医生的不同位置和状况如何影响他们对抑郁症的感知方式。特别关注的是老年人在谈论抑郁症方面所报告的影响力以及全科医生在应对方式方面所报告的影响力。为此,本研究寻求实用的解决方案来帮助GP识别老年人的抑郁症并为其提供适当的帮助。这项最新研究的方法论和方法基于扎根理论的最新版本《情境分析》(Clarke,2005年),该理论在哲学上介于符号互动主义和社会建构主义之间。 Clarke(2005)建立在Strauss和Corbin(1998)的工作的基础上,假设采用社会建构主义方法研究扎根理论,以探索人们的观点是如何形成的以及如何影响人们的行为。通过考虑研究人员和被研究人员的更广泛的情况,并从历史,地理和传记等多个角度看待数据,可以在不断变化和多面的环境中产生和定位理论。半结构式访谈以老年人和全科医生为主要数据形式,而研究人员(IG)对访谈的观察为背景数据。使用这种方法,已经建立了一个理论模型来解释老年人和全科医生在抑郁症咨询中的运作方式,并提出了不同类型的老年人和全科医生可能相互反应的方式。老年人报告讲述自己的抑郁症的故事以及全科医生报告的回应方式表明,他们可以在咨询中采取“多孔”和“灵活”的立场(Clarke,2005,第111页):访谈数据表明,老年人可以在在理解和接受抑郁症的各个阶段,全科医生可以在工作风格之间切换,并采用不同的技能组合来回应老年人的故事。变化的要素是该研究结果的关键,它表明了他们职位的流动性,根据他们当时对他们的影响,这些职位在这里发生变化。这项研究强调了认识老年人和全科医生在协商中的运作方式之间的差异以及影响他们彼此回应方式的不同因素的重要性。这表明全科医生以不同的风格工作可能会根据他们讲述故事的方式不同而对老年人有所帮助,一个重要信息是,能够使自己的技能适应这些需求的全科医生可能最成功地解决了这一问题。例如,一些老年人在接受抑郁症的治疗或疗法之前可能需要GP来帮助他们弄清问题,而另一些老年人可能需要GP来领导他们陷入困境时做出决定。理论模型表明,全科医生如何通过他们讲述的故事快速识别老年人的抑郁症以及他们处于抑郁症的阶段,以及他们如何适应技能以为他们提供最合适的帮助。这是迈出的一步,旨在理解导致晚年抑郁症咨询的根本原因,并为解决其管理中存在的问题找到解决方案。

著录项

  • 作者

    Gordon Isabel Hope-Jones;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2013
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 English
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号