首页> 外文OA文献 >China’s oil diplomacy : comparing Chinese economic statecraft in Angola and Brazil
【2h】

China’s oil diplomacy : comparing Chinese economic statecraft in Angola and Brazil

机译:中国的石油外交:比较安哥拉和巴西的中国经济治国方略

摘要

This thesis aims to investigate the reasons for the variation in China’s oil diplomacy performance in Africa and South America in the period 2000-2010. Lacking sound experience in pursuing oil security overseas and enjoying strong financial muscle, China’s oil diplomacy is largely rooted in the extension of soft loans for infrastructure to oil-rich countries in exchange for steady oil supply and favoured access to oil acreage. Taking Angola and Brazil as case studies this thesis argues that differences in the institutional structure of the oil industry in each country, determined different outcomes regarding Beijing’s oil security goals. This thesis has found that although this template fitted well with the more centralised institutional environment in Angola, it was highly unsuitable for the more liberal and regulated Brazil setting. Furthermore, the advent of the recent global economic crisis (2008-2009) caused China to adjust its approach to the institutional particulars of Brazil becoming more efficient in that country regarding its oil security goals. Building on foreign policy analysis tools and concepts, an empirical analysis of the interplay between Chinese infrastructure-for-oil loans (hereby regarded as positive economic statecraft) and the institutional structure it met in each country, is presented. Through the case studies, this thesis aims to uncover to what extent the institutional context constrained Chinese oil diplomacy efficiency in Brazil for most of the past decade, and how innovation has surfaced in the context of the global financial crisis. This analysis thus gives interesting insights not only into the dynamics of China’s oil diplomacy in Africa and South America, but also into Chinese economic statecraft in general and how constraints that surface at the implementation level feedback into foreign policy formulation.
机译:本文旨在研究2000年至2010年期间中国在非洲和南美的石油外交表现出现差异的原因。由于缺乏在海外寻求石油安全和拥有强大财务实力的良好经验,中国的石油外交很大程度上源于向富油国家提供基础设施的软贷款,以换取稳定的石油供应和有利的石油种植面积。本文以安哥拉和巴西为例,认为每个国家石油业的体制结构不同,决定了北京石油安全目标的不同结果。本论文发现,尽管该模板非常适合安哥拉更为集中的体制环境,但它非常不适合更自由和规范的巴西环境。此外,最近的全球经济危机(2008-2009)的到来使中国调整了其方法,以适应巴西在其石油安全目标方面在该国变得更有效率的机构细节。在外交政策分析工具和概念的基础上,对中国基础设施换石油贷款(据此被视为积极的经济治国方)与其在每个国家所遇到的制度结构之间的相互作用进行了实证分析。通过案例研究,本文旨在揭示在过去十年的大部分时间里,制度背景在多大程度上限制了中国在巴西的石油外交效率,以及在全球金融危机的背景下创新如何浮出水面。因此,该分析不仅对中国在非洲和南美的石油外交动态,而且对中国的经济治国之道,以及在执行层面如何体现出的制约因素如何反馈到外交政策制定方面都提供了有趣的见解。

著录项

  • 作者

    Alves Ana Cristina;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2011
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 English
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号