首页> 外文OA文献 >A comparison of palliative care needs and palliative care services for community based patients with cancer and non-cancer illnesses in the Greater Glasgow NHS Board area
【2h】

A comparison of palliative care needs and palliative care services for community based patients with cancer and non-cancer illnesses in the Greater Glasgow NHS Board area

机译:在大格拉斯哥NHs委员会区域对基于社区的癌症和非癌症患者的姑息治疗需求和姑息治疗服务进行比较

摘要

Recognition and education: It is important to ensure the inclusion within palliative care of chronic, progressive incurable diseases and for this additional workload to be adequately staffed and funded. There is a need to promote a clear, simple and friendly definition of Palliative Care for health care workers, patients and their carers. Education of the service providers, patients and the public to increase awareness of the palliative care needs of patients with non-cancer diseases will promote recognition and acceptance of this concept. Patient’s choice: There is a recognition among the GPs and distinct nurses for patients to be given the choice of place of care and death, and for patients and their carers to be involved in partnership in care decisions with healthcare professionals from the initial stages. This could be increased and improved if the generalist palliative care providers listened to and understood the needs of patients and their carers and promoted patient centred planning for all future strategies in palliative care. Co-ordination and communication: There is a need for improved communication and co-ordinated working between primary healthcare, social work community care, specialist palliative care teams, the voluntary sector and the acute setting. Joint working and multi-agency working groups and managed clinical networks could contribute to this. Services: Finite resources have led to service remodelling and redesign in both voluntary and statutory sectors. There were substantial changes in service provision during the study period. Over the three-year period of the study a greater number of services for patients with non-cancer were discontinued. There is a lack of specialist palliative care services in the acute sector. There is also a need for improved services including availability of hospice beds, palliative care services in care-homes and in particular social work services appear to be under provided. Health care professionals: The percentage of GPs and district nurses who had used current specialist palliative care services for their patients with cancer was more than double that of those who had used similar services for their patients with non-cancer diseases. GPs and district nurses also placed more importance on future palliative care services for their patients with cancer in comparison to similar services for their non-cancer patients. Compared to the GPs, the nurses had more contact with patients with non-cancer diseases and perhaps because of this had a greater recognition of the need for palliative care services for non-cancer patients. Service users: Patients with neurodegenerative diseases were younger compared to those with cancer. A higher percentage of patients with neurodegenerative diseases needed help with their daily activities compared to patients with cancer. There was a longer time interval between first appearance of symptoms and confirmation of diagnosis for patients with neurodegenerative diseases compared to patients with cancer. Lack of information was an issue highlighted by both groups of patients. The health status and care of the patients with neurodegenerative diseases was found to be inferior to patients with cancer. Resources: Funding was an issue identified by all service providers. Despite the desire to help with non-cancer diseases, providers of specialist palliative care and primary healthcare have their finite resources for palliative care fully utilised with cancer patients at present. The service providers agreed that they would increase their present workload, but were restricted by lack of resources. Research: There is a lack of evidence on the needs of non-cancer patients, on the best ways of meeting these needs and on the effectiveness and acceptability of services. This is necessary to provide the evidence to justify the resources (human and financial) that need to be allocated to make palliative care services to all on the basis of need and not on diagnosis
机译:认可和教育:重要的是要确保将慢性,进行性不治之症纳入姑息治疗,并为这一额外的工作量提供足够的人员和资金。有必要为医护人员,患者及其护理人员促进对姑息治疗的明确,简单和友好的定义。对服务提供者,患者和公众的教育,以增加对非癌症疾病患者姑息治疗需求的认识,将促进对该概念的认可和接受。患者的选择:全科医生和独特的护士之间的认可是,患者可以选择护理地点和死亡地点,患者及其护理人员从最初阶段就可以与医疗保健专业人员一起参与护理决策合作。如果通才的姑息治疗提供者听取并理解了患者及其护理人员的需求,并促进了以患者为中心的针对姑息治疗所有未来策略的计划,则可以增加和改善这种情况。协调与沟通:初级卫生保健,社会工作社区护理,姑息姑息治疗团队,志愿部门和急性环境之间需要改善沟通和协调工作。联合工作组和多机构工作组以及受管理的临床网络可以对此做出贡献。服务:有限的资源导致自愿和法定部门的服务重塑和重新设计。在研究期间,服务提供发生了重大变化。在研究的三年期间,不再为非癌症患者提供更多服务。急诊部门缺乏专业的姑息治疗服务。还需要改善的服务,包括提供临终关怀床,疗养院中的姑息治疗服务,特别是似乎未提供社会工作服务。卫生保健专业人员:为癌症患者使用现有专业姑息治疗服务的全科医生和地区护士的比例是为非癌症疾病患者提供类似姑息治疗服务的比例的两倍以上。与非癌症患者的类似服务相比,全科医生和地区护士还更加重视为其癌症患者提供的姑息治疗服务。与全科医生相比,护士与非癌症疾病患者的接触更多,也许因为这样,他们更加认识到非癌症患者需要姑息治疗服务。服务使用者:神经退行性疾病患者比癌症患者年轻。与癌症患者相比,神经退行性疾病患者在日常活动中需要帮助的比例更高。与癌症患者相比,神经退行性疾病患者的症状首次出现与确诊之间的时间间隔更长。缺乏信息是两组患者都强调的问题。发现神经退行性疾病患者的健康状况和护理不如癌症患者。资源:资金是所有服务提供商都发现的问题。尽管渴望帮助非癌症疾病,但是目前,专职姑息治疗和初级保健的提供者拥有有限的资源,可以充分利用癌症患者的姑息治疗。服务提供商同意,他们将增加目前的工作量,但由于缺乏资源而受到限制。研究:缺乏关于非癌症患者需求,满足这些需求的最佳方法以及服务的有效性和可接受性的证据。这是必要的,以提供证据来证明需要根据需要而不是根据诊断为所有人提供姑息治疗服务的资源(人力和财力)是合理的

著录项

  • 作者

    Velupillai Yoganathan;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2004
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 English
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号