首页> 外文OA文献 >Science as practical criticism : an investigation into revolutionary subjectivity in Marx's critique of political economy
【2h】

Science as practical criticism : an investigation into revolutionary subjectivity in Marx's critique of political economy

机译:科学作为实践批判:对马克思政治经济学批判中革命主体性的考察

摘要

The key theoretical concern of this doctoral research is to trace the way in which Marx discovered and developed the determinations of the revolutionary subjectivity of the working class. In order to achieve this, a critical reading of Marx's 'early writings' from the perspective of his later works was carried out in the first part of the thesis. Specifically, the analysis attempted to find in both the insights and limitations of the former and clues towards the direction that Marx's later development would take. One of the original results of my reassessment of Marx's early work is to uncover the methodological significance of those texts for Marx's re-appropriation of Hegel's dialectical method and the consequent determination of social science as practical criticism. The second part of my investigation consists in a critical analysis of the ways in which these early insights crystallised in the writing of Capital. The aim of this critical reading of Marx's most important work is to provide a reconstruction which goes beyond traditional Marxist theories and their unresolved tension between the forms of objectivity and the forms of subjectivity of capitalist society. In particular, my thesis is that most readings of Marx tend to see revolutionary subjectivity as abstractly free and as the opposite of the subjectivity alienated in capital. My own investigation of Marx's critical theory aims to show that, for him, emancipatory subjectivity itself is a social form of the alienated subjectivity of the modern individual. I show that the genesis of that emancipatory subject can be found in the transformations in the materiality of social life brought about by the real subsumption of humanity to capital. Finally, the investigation attempts to thematise the intrinsic connection between these questions of subjectivity and Marx's dialectical method.
机译:该博士研究的主要理论关注点是追溯马克思发现和发展工人阶级革命主体性的方法。为了实现这一目标,论文的第一部分对马克思的“早期著作”进行了批判性的解读。具体而言,分析试图从前者的见解和局限中寻找线索,并为马克思的后继发展所采取的方向提供线索。我对马克思早期工作的重新评估的原始结果之一是,揭示这些文本对于马克思重新采用黑格尔的辩证法以及由此确定的社会科学作为实践批评的方法论意义。我的研究的第二部分包括对这些早期见解在《资本论》写作中形成方式的批判性分析。批判性地阅读马克思的最重要著作的目的是提供一种超越传统马克思主义理论及其在资本主义社会的客观形式与主观形式之间未解决的张力的重构。特别是,我的论点是,大多数马克思的读物倾向于将革命的主体性抽象地视为自由的,并且与资本异化的主体性相反。我自己对马克思的批判理论的研究旨在表明,对他来说,解放的主体性本身是现代人疏远的主体性的一种社会形式。我表明,解放性主体的起源可以在人类对资本的真正包容所带来的社会生活的物质性转变中找到。最后,研究试图主题化这些主观性问题与马克思的辩证法之间的内在联系。

著录项

  • 作者

    Starosta Guido;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2005
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 English
  • 中图分类
  • 入库时间 2022-08-20 21:06:20

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号