首页> 外文OA文献 >The Politics of ‘Euro-Atlantic Orientation’: Political Identities Interests and Albanian Foreign Policy 1992-2007
【2h】

The Politics of ‘Euro-Atlantic Orientation’: Political Identities Interests and Albanian Foreign Policy 1992-2007

机译:“欧洲 - 大西洋方向”的政治:1992 - 2007年的政治认同利益和阿尔巴尼亚外交政策

摘要

This thesis explores the shifts and continuities in the construction of security in the post-communist period. The thesis provides an insight into the reasons and the ways in which the dominant discourse of security and foreign policy of the Albanian state shifted in 1997 from a an emphasis on the ‘nation’ and ‘national sovereignty’ into a liberal discourse which emphasized the ‘economy’ and the ‘region’. The overarching question of the thesis is why did the Euro-Atlantic orientation become the hegemonic discourse of Albanian foreign and security policy in the post-1997 period? In order to find the answer for this question I will concentrate on the meanings that the Albanian political elites—and more specifically the two main governing parties, the Democratic Party and the Socialist Party— have attached to the notions of ‘national question’ and ‘Euro-Atlantic orientation’. The argument of the thesis is that the different articulations of ‘Euro-Atlantic orientation’ and of the ‘national interest’ have relied upon the elites’ different conceptions of self, that is, what constituted Albanianism. In turn, the political actors translate the basic identity narratives of the nation through their ideological/interpretative repertoires. The thesis builds on Discourse Theory and particularly the approach developed by Ernesto Laclau and Chantal Mouffe (1985) By incorporating notions of ‘identification strategies’, ‘interpretative repertoires’ and ‘myth’ into the framework of Lene Hansen and Ole Waever (2001), the thesis reveals the intricate interplay between the construction of state identity and of political identities in post-communist Albania.
机译:本文探讨了后共产主义时期安全建设的变迁和连续性。该论文提供了对阿尔巴尼亚国家安全和外交政策占主导地位的论述在1997年从强调“民族”和“国家主权”转变为强调“民主”的自由主义论述的原因和方式的见解。经济”和“区域”。论文的首要问题是,为什么在1997年以后的时期,以欧洲-大西洋为导向成为阿尔巴尼亚外交与安全政策的霸权主义论述?为了找到这个问题的答案,我将集中讨论阿尔巴尼亚政治精英,尤其是两个主要执政党,民主党和社会党,对“民族问题”和“欧洲大西洋方向”。该论文的论点是,“欧洲大西洋取向”和“国家利益”的不同表述依赖于精英们不同的自我概念,即阿尔巴尼亚主义的构成。反过来,政治角色则通过其意识形态/解释方法来翻译国家的基本身份叙事。本文以话语理论为基础,尤其是由埃内斯托·拉克劳和尚塔尔·穆菲(1985)通过将“识别策略”,“解释性曲目”和“神话”的概念纳入Lene Hansen和Ole Waever(2001)的框架中,这篇论文揭示了后共产主义阿尔巴尼亚国家身份建构与政治身份建构之间的复杂相互作用。

著录项

  • 作者

    Barbullushi Odeta;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2010
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 English
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号