首页> 外文OA文献 >Just war theory revisited : the case for a new legal regime for humanitarian forceful intervention
【2h】

Just war theory revisited : the case for a new legal regime for humanitarian forceful intervention

机译:正是重新审视了战争理论:人道主义部队干预新法律制度的案例

摘要

The current regime for humanitarian forceful intervention has posed enormous challenges to international law and international relations. This is partly because there is no express provision for the principle in the UN Charter. This status quo has seen a regrettable loss of life and genocidal crimes being committed against civilians. This gap in international law has no doubt given weight to the emerging principle of Responsibility to Protect, which despite the challenges it faces, has made significant strides towards norm building. The current intervention in Libya is a arguably a first true test of the concept. The growing significance of the doctrine has given me the courage to attempt a case for a new, consistent and clear legal regime for humanitarian forceful intervention.
机译:当前的人道主义有力干预制度对国际法和国际关系构成了巨大挑战。部分原因是《联合国宪章》中没有明确规定该原则。这种现状令人遗憾地丧失了生命,并对平民犯了灭绝种族罪。毫无疑问,国际法中的这种差距使新出现的“保护责任”原则得到了重视,尽管它面临着挑战,但在建立规范方面已取得了长足的进步。目前对利比亚的干预可以说是对该概念的首次真实检验。该学说的重要性越来越大,这使我有勇气尝试建立一种新的,一致的和明确的法律制度,以进行人道主义的有力干预。

著录项

  • 作者

    Akame Gilbert Ajebe;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2011
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号