首页> 外文OA文献 >“It was a Hard Life”:Class and Gender in the Work and Family Rhythms of a Railway Town, 1920‑1950
【2h】

“It was a Hard Life”:Class and Gender in the Work and Family Rhythms of a Railway Town, 1920‑1950

机译:“这是艰难的生活”:1920 - 1950年铁路城镇工作和家庭节奏中的阶级和性别

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Most social histories of the working class have focussed on women's or men's experiencealone. However, while studies of working-class women have often been sensitive to theway in which class and gender relationships are constructed and reconstructedsimultaneously, histories of working-class men have been largely gender-blind. In anattempt to provide a more comprehensive understanding of gender-based divisions inthe working-class experience this study examines the relationship between male andfemale work worlds in the railway ward of Barrie, Ontario between 1920 and 1950.Based primarily on oral history, this paper argues that the class and genderconditions and relations of the period set limits to what was available and possible for themen and women of the railway ward. In most families, husbands were breadwinners andwives were full-time homemakers. This pattern was the response of railroad families tothe constraints created by the gender division of wage work, railway labour rhythms, theprevailing conditions of reproductive labour, and the ideology of patriarchy. None theless, railroaders and their wives also made choices within the limitations of their lives.These choices had different implications for the men and women of the community.The strategies men and women adopted for survival and well-being also began tochange over the period, both altering as well as being changed by the constraints theyfaced. As conditions changed, concepts of masculinity and femininity which informedtheir strategies began to shift — but not dramatically. The experience of the railwaycommunity revealed that the construction of gender identities was a complex andcontradictory process. Indeed, the historical literature on the social construction ofgender has really only began to grapple with the many dimensions which comprised thatprocess.
机译:工人阶级的大多数社会历史都集中在妇女或男子的经验上。但是,尽管对工人阶级妇女的研究通常对同时建立和重建阶级和性别关系的方式很敏感,但工人阶级男人的历史却在很大程度上是性别盲目的。为了对工人阶级的经验中的性别划分有更全面的了解,本研究考察了1920至1950年安大略省Barrie铁路病房中男女劳动世界之间的关系。那个时期的阶级,性别状况和关系限制了铁路病房男女所能获得的和可能的。在大多数家庭中,丈夫是养家糊口,妻子是专职家庭主妇。这种模式是铁路家庭对工资工作的性别划分,铁路劳动节律,生殖劳动的普遍条件以及父权制意识形态所造成的制约的反应。尽管如此,铁路工人和他们的妻子也在生活范围内做出了选择,这些选择对社区的男女都有不同的影响。在此期间,男女为生存和福祉采取的策略也开始发生变化,所面临的约束既改变又被改变。随着条件的改变,男性气质和女性气质的概念开始改变他们的策略,但并没有发生太大变化。铁路社区的经验表明,性别认同的建构是一个复杂而矛盾的过程。确实,有关性别的社会建构的历史文献实际上才刚刚开始解决构成这一过程的许多方面。

著录项

  • 作者

    Rosenfeld Mark;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 1988
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号