首页> 外文OA文献 >»Amerikanisierung« Europas? Zur Vereinbarkeit von Wirtschaftsliberalismus und demokratischem Wohlfahrtsstaat. 'Americanization' of Europe? On the compatibility of economic liberalism and democratic welfare state. IHS Political Science Series 39, November 1996
【2h】

»Amerikanisierung« Europas? Zur Vereinbarkeit von Wirtschaftsliberalismus und demokratischem Wohlfahrtsstaat. 'Americanization' of Europe? On the compatibility of economic liberalism and democratic welfare state. IHS Political Science Series 39, November 1996

机译:»amerikanisierung«Europas? Zur Vereinbarkeit von Wirtschaftsliberalismus und demokratischem Wohlfahrtsstaat。欧洲的“美国化”?论经济自由主义与民主福利国家的兼容性。 IHs政治学系列丛书,1996年11月

摘要

The paper approaches the question whether a distinctive European answer to the challenges of globalization, neo-liberalism, and social disintegration is both available and feasible. After describing the influence the American model of capital accumulation exerted on Europe's economic, social, and cultural development, the paper argues that, in spite of the hegemonic project the United States pursued after WW II, viable national variants of capitalism developed in Western Europe and Japan. With the exhaustion of the Fordist model of accumulation in the 70s and 80s a new constellation arises that threatens the social compromise the European welfare state is based upon. The globalization of production and the politics and ideology of neo-liberalism work hand in hand, producing a shift in the balance of social forces, decreasing national capacities of economic regulation, growing inequality, and the marginalisation of a growing number of social groups. Although there is a convergence of fundamental trends in regard of the modes of accumulation, we are stuck in a highly ambiguous and indeterminate situation. The erosion of national particularities does not lead to total homogeneity, neither inside the triad of USA, Japan and Europe nor inside the European Union. The crises of the traditional welfare state in Europe can only be overcome if a new, independent model of »Social Europe« will be constructed. In doing so Europe faces a dilemma: Only if it manages to overcome neo-liberal policies and develop a common vision of the future it will gain the freedom of action that is needed for such an endeavor and that is lacking at the national level.
机译:本文探讨了这样一个问题,即欧洲对全球化,新自由主义和社会瓦解的挑战的独特答案是否既可行又可行。在描述了美国资本积累模式对欧洲的经济,社会和文化发展所施加的影响之后,论文认为,尽管美国在二战后进行了霸权主义计划,但在西欧和美国发展了可行的资本主义国家变体。日本。随着上世纪70年代和80年代福特斯(Fordist)积累模型的穷尽,出现了一个新的星座,威胁到欧洲福利国家所基于的社会妥协。生产的全球化与新自由主义的政治和意识形态齐头并进,导致社会力量平衡的变化,国家经济调节能力的下降,不平等的加剧以及越来越多的社会群体的边缘化。尽管就积累方式而言基本趋势已经趋于一致,但我们陷入了高度模棱两可和不确定的局面。国家特殊性的侵蚀不会导致完全同质化,无论是在美国,日本和欧洲的三合会内部还是在欧盟内部。只有建立新的,独立的“社会欧洲”模式,才能克服欧洲传统福利国家的危机。欧洲这样做面临两难选择:只有设法克服新自由主义政策并形成对未来的共同愿景,欧洲才能获得这种努力所需要的行动自由,这是国家一级所缺乏的。

著录项

  • 作者

    Ziebura Gilbert;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 1996
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"de","name":"German","id":7}
  • 中图分类
  • 入库时间 2022-08-20 21:04:48

相似文献

  • 外文文献

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号