首页> 外文OA文献 >Empower Users of Financial Information as the IASC Foundation's Stakeholders. Testimony to the IASC Foundations's Constitutional Review Round Table in London, 19 June 2008. Bruegel Policy Contribution, July 11, 2008
【2h】

Empower Users of Financial Information as the IASC Foundation's Stakeholders. Testimony to the IASC Foundations's Constitutional Review Round Table in London, 19 June 2008. Bruegel Policy Contribution, July 11, 2008

机译:将财务信息用户授权为IasC基金会的利益相关者。 2008年6月19日在伦敦举行的IasC基金会宪法审查圆桌会议的证词.Bruegel政策贡献,2008年7月11日

摘要

Nicolas Véron comments on the proposal for governance reform ('constitution review') published in May 2008 by the IASC Foundation, the private-sector body which oversees the setting of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). He emphasizes the unprecedented nature of this global governance experiment and advocates more direct representation of investors as the primary stakeholders of international accounting standard-setting, as well a more thorough consultation process. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. The creation of a new body with authority over Trustee appointments and reappointments is a crucial step for the IASC Foundation. This body is likely to be granted more authority in the future over other key governance functions, including the Foundation’s funding. In this respect, the proposed Monitoring Group contains significant flaws, the primary one being its inability to credibly represent at global level the investors and other capitalmarket users which should be considered the Foundation’s key stakeholders. Moreover, the very short timetable proposed for the first part of the Foundation’s Constitution Review is not warranted by the circumstances. The Foundation's Trustees should take a step back and consider a revised concept of oversight body as part of a onephase Constitution Review to be completed in 2009.
机译:NicolasVéron对IASC基金会于2008年5月发布的治理改革提案(“宪法审查”)发表评论,IASC基金会是监督国际财务报告准则(IFRS)制定的私营部门机构。他强调了这种全球治理实验的前所未有的性质,并主张使投资者更直接地代表国际会计准则制定的主要利益相关者,以及更全面的咨询过程。执行摘要。建立一个新的机构来管理受托人的任命和重新任命是机构间常设委员会基金会的关键步骤。将来,该机构可能会获得其他重要治理职能(包括基金会的资助)的更多授权。在这方面,拟议的监督小组存在重大缺陷,主要的缺陷是它无法在全球范围内可靠地代表投资者和其他资本市场用户,而这应被视为基金会的主要利益相关者。此外,在这种情况下,基金会宪法审查第一部分提议的时间表很短。基金会的受托人应退后一步,并考虑将修订后的监督机构概念作为将于2009年完成的宪法第一阶段审查的一部分。

著录项

  • 作者

    Veron Nicolas.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2008
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号