首页> 外文OA文献 >'Trouble Brewing? EU and Member State Public Health Policy and the European Beer Industry'. European Policy Paper #10, November 2005
【2h】

'Trouble Brewing? EU and Member State Public Health Policy and the European Beer Industry'. European Policy Paper #10, November 2005

机译:“麻烦酿造?欧盟和成员国公共卫生政策和欧洲啤酒行业”。欧洲政策文件#10,2005年11月

摘要

[Summary]. During the past decade, the European Union (EU) has increased its competence in consumer safety and public health. Under Article 152 of the Amsterdam Treaty, for example, the EU is committed to ensure "a high level of health protection." This increased competence has allowed the EU to extend its regulatory reach. In the summer of 2005, the European Commission began to enforce a ban on advertising and sponsorship of cross border events by tobacco companies within the EU. This includes a ban on sponsorships of Formula One race car drivers by tobacco companies. The new Commissioner for Health and Consumer Affairs, Markos Kyprianou, warned the alcoholic beverage industry earlier this year that it must stop marketing its products to young drinkers or the EU will take action in this area. Such Europewide regulations have been advocated by non-producer groups, which have increasingly mobilized in Brussels. The focus on public health issues poses new challenges to European business and has increased the incentives for firms and trade associations to mobilize more effectively in Brussels in order to influence the EU’s regulatory policies. This paper explores the political response of one sector of the economy – European beer brewing – to these new challenges. Beer brewing is an important industry in Europe. Europe is home to five of the six largest global beer producers. European beer brewers account for 60% of the world’s beer exports and 30% of global beer production. The European brewers are represented in Brussels by the Brewers of Europe (BoE), which is a confederation of 21 national associations and represents approximately 90% of beer producers in the EU-25. During the past few years, the brewers have restructured their trade association in Brussels and engaged in more aggressive lobbying in order to influence the EU’s policy-making process. In this paper, I seek to explain these changes by examining the increased concentration of the sector and the increased attention to public health by non-producer groups such as Eurocare7, the World Health Organization (WHO), some national governments, and the European Commission. I then analyze the extent to which the political activities of the brewers have shaped the debate over alcohol control in the EU. This case study on the European brewing sector and alcohol control policy allows me to explore several broader questions. These include: - What is the impact of industrial consolidation on collective mobilization? - How have market liberalization and the increased competence of the EU affected the debate over public health? - What is the relative effectiveness of industry and non-producer groups in the policy-making process? The paper draws on interviews with Commission officials, European and national trade association officials, and individual brewers, which I conducted in 1989-91 and in 2003-04. By conducting interviews over time, I can compare the changes in the political activities of the brewers before and after the major consolidation of the industry and before and after the emergence of major alcohol control groups and the accession of the Scandinavian countries to the EU. The paper is divided into six sections. The first section outlines the economic characteristics and political organization of European beer brewers prior to the 1990s. The second section explores the impact of increasing competitive pressures on the brewers during the 1990s and early 2000s, which led to the increased concentration of the industry and the emergence of five multinational firms - InBev, SABMiller, Heineken, Carlsberg, and Scottish & Newcastle. The third section analyzes the activities of Eurocare, WHO’s Regional Office for Europe, the member states, and the European Commission to reduce alcohol-related harm. The fourth section examines the political response of the brewers to those activities, focusing in particular on the political reorganization of their European trade association and its lobbying activities in Brussels. In the fifth section, I discuss the impact of the brewers’ political reorganization and lobbying on the debate over alcohol control policy in the EU. Finally, I draw some conclusions about the changes in the brewers’ association and the EU’s policy-making.
机译:[摘要]。在过去的十年中,欧盟(EU)增强了其在消费者安全和公共卫生方面的能力。例如,根据《阿姆斯特丹条约》第152条,欧盟承诺确保“高水平的健康保护”。不断增强的竞争力使欧盟得以扩大监管范围。在2005年夏天,欧盟委员会开始禁止欧盟境内烟草公司对跨境活动进行广告和赞助。这包括禁止烟草公司赞助一级方程式赛车手。新的健康与消费者事务专员Markos Kyprianou今年早些时候警告酒精饮料行业,它必须停止向年轻饮酒者销售其产品,否则欧盟将在这一领域采取行动。非生产者团体提倡这种欧洲范围的法规,这些团体在布鲁塞尔日益动员起来。对公共卫生问题的关注给欧洲企业带来了新的挑战,并增加了企业和行业协会在布鲁塞尔更有效地动员以影响欧盟监管政策的动力。本文探讨了一个经济部门(欧洲啤酒酿造)对这些新挑战的政治反应。啤酒酿造是欧洲的重要产业。欧洲是全球六大啤酒生产国中的五国之一。欧洲啤酒酿造商占全球啤酒出口量的60%,占全球啤酒产量的30%。欧洲啤酒商(BoE)是布鲁塞尔的欧洲啤酒商,欧洲啤酒商(BoE)是21个国家协会的联合会,约占EU-25中啤酒生产商的90%。在过去的几年中,酿酒商重组了布鲁塞尔的贸易协会,并进行了更积极的游说活动,以影响欧盟的决策过程。在本文中,我试图通过研究该行业的集中度提高以及非生产者团体(如Eurocare7,世界卫生组织(WHO),一些国家政府和欧盟委员会)对公共卫生的关注日益增加来解释这些变化。 。然后,我分析了酿酒商的政治活动在多大程度上影响了欧盟对酒精管制的争论。这个关于欧洲酿造业和酒精管制政策的案例研究使我能够探索几个更广泛的问题。其中包括:-产业整合对集体动员有什么影响? -市场自由化和欧盟竞争力的增强如何影响有关公共卫生的辩论? -工业和非生产者团体在决策过程中的相对效力是什么?本文借鉴了我在1989-91年和2003-04年对委员会官员,欧洲和国家贸易协会官员以及个人酿酒商的采访。通过一段时间内的采访,我可以比较啤酒业在主要行业合并前后,主要酒精控制组织出现之前和之后以及斯堪的纳维亚国家加入欧盟之前和之后的政治活动变化。本文分为六个部分。第一部分概述了1990年代之前欧洲啤酒酿造商的经济特征和政治组织。第二部分探讨了1990年代至2000年代初期竞争压力对啤酒酿造商的影响,这导致啤酒行业的集中度提高,并出现了5家跨国公司-英博,SABMiller,喜力,嘉士伯和苏格兰与纽卡斯尔。第三部分分析了Eurocare,世卫组织欧洲区域办事处,成员国和欧盟委员会为减少与酒精有关的危害而开展的活动。第四部分考察了酿酒商对这些活动的政治反应,尤其着眼于欧洲贸易协会的政治重组及其在布鲁塞尔的游说活动。在第五部分中,我讨论了啤酒制造商的政治重组和游说活动对欧盟关于酒精管制政策的辩论的影响。最后,我对啤酒商协会和欧盟政策制定的变化得出一些结论。

著录项

  • 作者

    Camerra-Rowe Pamela.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2005
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号