首页> 外文OA文献 >A cluster randomized controlled non-inferiority trial of 5-day Dose Adjustment for Normal Eating ( DAFNE) training delivered over 1 week versus 5-day DAFNE training delivered over 5 weeks: the DAFNE 5 x 1-day trial
【2h】

A cluster randomized controlled non-inferiority trial of 5-day Dose Adjustment for Normal Eating ( DAFNE) training delivered over 1 week versus 5-day DAFNE training delivered over 5 weeks: the DAFNE 5 x 1-day trial

机译:一项为期5天的正常饮食剂量调整(DaFNE)培训的集群随机对照非劣效性试验,为期5周,为期5天DaFNE培训:DaFNE 5 x 1天试验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

AimsudTo compare, in a randomized controlled non-inferiority trial, the outcomes of the traditional format for Dose Adjustment for Normal Eating structured education courses; that is, one delivered over 5 consecutive days (1-week course) with a variant of this format delivered 1 day a week for 5 consecutive weeks (5-week course).ududMethodsudAdults with Type 1 diabetes, from seven UK Dose Adjustment For Normal Eating training centres, were individually randomized, stratified by centre, to receive either a 1-week or 5-week course. A qualitative study was embedded within the trial to explore patients’ experiences.ududResultsudIn total, 213 patients were randomized and 160 completed the study procedures. In the per-protocol analysis, the difference in HbA1c levels (95% CI) between the arms at 6 months was 0.4 mmol/mol (−2.4, 3.1) or 0.03% (−0.22, 0.28) and −0.9 mmol/mol (−3.9, 2.2) or −0.08% (−0.36, 0.20) at 12 months. All confidence limits were within the non-inferiority margin of ± 5.5 mmol/mol (0.5%) for HbA1c%. For those patients with a baseline HbA1c of ≥ 58 mmol/mol (≥ 7.5%) the mean change (95% CI) in HbA1c was −2.2 mmol/mol (−4.0, −0.4) or −0.20% (−0.37, −0.04) at 6 months (P = 0.016), and −2.0 mmol/mol (−4.1, 0.04) or −0.18% (−0.37 to 0.004) at 12 months (P = 0.055). Episodes of severe hypoglycaemia were decreased by 82% [relative risk 0.18 (95% CI 0.03–0.936); P = 0.042], psychosocial outcomes improved significantly, and the difference between arms was not significant. Qualitative interviews showed that patients overwhelmingly favoured the format of course that they attended.ududConclusionsudIn summary, 5-week and 1-week Dose Adjustment for Normal Eating courses are equivalent in terms of biomedical and psychosocial outcomes, and we were persuaded that both course formats should be made available in routine care.
机译:目的 ud在一项随机对照非劣效性试验中比较常规饮食结构调整教育课程剂量调整的传统格式的结果;也就是说,一种连续5天(1周疗程)分娩,这种格式的变体每周5天(5周疗程)每周1天分娩。 ud udMethods ud来自7种成年人的1型糖尿病英国针对正常饮食的剂量调整培训中心分别进行了随机分组,按中心分层,以接受1周或5周的课程。定性研究被嵌入试验中以探索患者的经历。 ud ud结果 ud总共,共有213名患者被随机分配,其中160名完成了研究程序。在按方案分析中,六个月时两组之间的HbA1c水平(95%CI)之差为0.4 mmol / mol(-2.4,3.1)或0.03%(-0.22,0.28)和-0.9 mmol / mol(在12个月时为-3.9、2.2)或-0.08%(-0.36,0.20)。对于HbA1c%,所有置信限均在±5.5 mmol / mol(0.5%)的非劣效性范围内。对于基线HbA1c≥58 mmol / mol(≥7.5%)的患者,HbA1c的平均变化(95%CI)为-2.2 mmol / mol(-4.0,-0.4)或-0.20%(-0.37,-在6个月时(P = 0.016)为0.04),在12个月时为-2.0 mmol / mol(-4.1,0.04)或-0.18%(-0.37至0.004)(P = 0.055)。严重低血糖发作减少了82%[相对危险度0.18(95%CI 0.03–0.936); P = 0.042],社会心理结果显着改善,两组之间的差异不显着。定性访谈显示,患者绝对偏爱他们参加的课程。 ud ud结论 ud总而言之,就正常饮食课程而言,为期5周和1周的剂量调整在生物医学和社会心理结果方面是等效的,我们被说服了应当在日常护理中提供两种课程格式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号