首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparison of RANS and LES turbulence models for predicting air-coal and oxy-coal combustion behaviours
【2h】

Comparison of RANS and LES turbulence models for predicting air-coal and oxy-coal combustion behaviours

机译:RaNs和LEs湍流模型预测空煤和氧煤燃烧特性的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

It is commonly accepted that with existing physical sub-models, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) can offer significant insight to the complex combustion systems such as those found in the coal-fired power generation industry. With the growth of computing resources and, in particular, the availability of powerful computer clusters, application of Large Eddy Simulation (LES) emerges as an attractive option in modelling of turbulence combustions in coal-fired furnaces. This paper presents the results from a CFD simulation of the coal combustion processes, under both air-fired and oxy-fired conditions in a 1 MWth industrial combustion test facility. Both Reynolds Averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) and LES approaches have been employed and the results are compared with each other and with experimental measurements. Advantages of the LES underlining its potential for future industrial applications are addressed. It is shown that validation a CFD model that is based on LES requires more detailed experimental data from well-controlled experimental measurements.
机译:公认的是,使用现有的物理子模型,计算流体力学(CFD)可以为复杂的燃烧系统(例如燃煤发电行业中的燃烧系统)提供重要的见识。随着计算资源的增长,特别是功能强大的计算机集群的可用性,大涡流模拟(LES)的应用已成为燃煤炉湍流燃烧建模中的一种有吸引力的选择。本文介绍了在1兆瓦时的工业燃烧测试设施中,在空燃和氧气燃烧条件下,煤燃烧过程的CFD模拟结果。雷诺平均Navier-Stokes(RANS)和LES方法都已被采用,并且将结果彼此进行比较,并与实验测量结果进行比较。强调了LES的优势,强调了其在未来工业应用中的潜力。结果表明,验证基于LES的CFD模型需要来自控制良好的实验测量的更详细的实验数据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号