首页> 外文OA文献 >European versus Anglo-Saxon credit view: Evidence from the eurozone sovereign debt crisis
【2h】

European versus Anglo-Saxon credit view: Evidence from the eurozone sovereign debt crisis

机译:欧洲与盎格鲁 - 撒克逊的信贷观点:来自欧元区主权债务危机的证据

摘要

We analyse whether different levels of country ties to Europe among the rating agencies Moody's, S&P, and Fitch affect the assignment of sovereign credit ratings, using the Eurozone sovereign debt crisis of 2009-2012 as a natural laboratory. We find that Fitch, the rating agency among the "Big Three" with significantly stronger ties to Europe compared to its two more US-tied peers, assigned on average more favourable ratings to Eurozone issuers during the crisis. However, Fitch's better ratings for Eurozone issuers seem to be neglected by investors as they rather follow the rating actions of Moody's and S&P. Our results thus doubt the often proposed need for an independent European credit rating agency.
机译:我们以2009-2012年的欧元区主权债务危机为自然实验室,分析了评级机构穆迪(Moody's),标准普尔(S&P)和惠誉(Fitch)之间与欧洲的不同国家联系程度是否会影响主权信用等级的分配。我们发现,惠誉是与欧洲同盟的“三巨头”之一,与欧洲其他两家同行相比,与欧洲的联系要牢固得多,在危机期间,它们对欧元区发行人的平均评价更高。然而,惠誉对欧元区发行人的更高评级似乎被投资者所忽视,因为他们宁愿遵循穆迪和标普的评级行动。因此,我们的结果对通常建议的建立独立的欧洲信用评级机构的需求表示怀疑。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号