首页> 外文OA文献 >E-business in Service Industries : Usage patterns and service gaps
【2h】

E-business in Service Industries : Usage patterns and service gaps

机译:服务行业的电子商务:使用模式和服务差距

摘要

The empirical data presented here have been derived from a company survey which has been conducted in eight service sectors across the EU. From these eight sectors four sectors have been chosen for the present analysis. The criterion for selection was comparability with respect to market orientation, regulation intensity and performance indicators. The dynamics of growth of the service industries analysed here varies between countries (E-biz Market Watch Group 2002, see also Preissl 2000). Country comparisons allow to observe specific specialisation patterns and possible deficits: Complete data sets are available for France, Germany, Italy and the UK. It will be particularly interesting to have a closer look at the situation in Germany, since this country is generally considered a ?service laggard? (see summaries of the debate in Cornetz/Schue4fer 1999 and in Stille, Preissl, Schupp 2003). On the basis of the empirical material on e-business available from the survey, it will be possible to check, if the often stated lack of service sector dynamics (see, for example, Bullinger 1997) also holds for the introduction of innovative technology-based business models in service firms. If service sectors in Germany, compared with their main competitors in Europe are reluctant to introduce e-business, the service gap gains another dimension. The gap is usually identified in oversimplifying terms of shares of services in total employment and value added in a country compared with other countries. It has been pointed out that these indicators are not relevant to estimate the structural ?soundness? of an economy (Stille, Preissl, Schupp 2003) which rather rests on the systemic context that makes a particular mix of industries successful. However, undoubtedly, the performance of services that provide essential inputs in many processes of production and efficient services to private households plays an important role in generating a modern services-manufacturing mix. This leads to two central research questions which will be discussed in this paper: (1) how is the heterogeneity of services reflected in their use of ICT and e-business adoptions across Europe? and (2) do German service industries differ from other European countries with respect to the use of e-business opportunities?
机译:此处提供的经验数据来自公司调查,该调查已在欧盟的八个服务行业进行。从这八个部门中选择了四个部门进行本分析。选择的标准是在市场定位,监管强度和绩效指标方面的可比性。此处分析的服务业增长动力因国家而异(E-biz Market Watch Group 2002,另见Preissl 2000)。国家之间的比较可以观察到特定的专业化模式和可能存在的不足:法国,德国,意大利和英国可以使用完整的数据集。仔细研究德国的情况将特别有趣,因为德国通常被认为是“服务落后者”。 (请参见1999年Cornetz / Sch ue4fer和2003年在Stille,Preissl和Stille的Stille中的辩论摘要)。根据从调查中获得的有关电子商务的经验材料,有可能检查一下,经常说缺乏服务部门动态的情况(例如,参见Bullinger 1997)是否也适用于引入创新技术,服务公司中基于业务的模型。如果与欧洲的主要竞争对手相比,德国的服务业不愿引入电子商务,那么服务差距就会扩大。与其他国家相比,通常通过过度简化一个国家的服务在总就业和增加值中所占的比例来确定差距。已经指出,这些指标与估计结构的“健全性”无关。经济(Stille,Preissl,Schupp,2003年),而是建立在使特定产业组合成功的系统背景下。但是,毫无疑问,在许多生产过程中提供必不可少的投入以及向私人家庭提供有效服务的服务绩效在产生现代服务制造组合中起着重要作用。这引出了两个将在本文中讨论的核心研究问题:(1)服务的异质性如何在整个欧洲的ICT使用和电子商务采用中得到反映? (2)在利用电子商务机会方面,德国服务业是否与其他欧洲国家不同?

著录项

  • 作者

    Preissl Brigitte;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2003
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号