首页> 外文OA文献 >Regional integration APEC style: Are there lessons to learn from regional integration EU style?
【2h】

Regional integration APEC style: Are there lessons to learn from regional integration EU style?

机译:区域一体化apEC风格:是否有从欧盟区域一体化中学习的经验教训?

摘要

The paper discusses similarities and differences between past EU binding internal liberalization u201eacross the boardu201c in the industrial sector and present so-called voluntary sectoral liberalization of member states of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC). While both approaches are second-best compared to unconcerted unilateral liberalization, the major disadvantage of liberalization APEC style in the industrial sector consists in introducing distortions between sectors as well as between member states due to rising disparities in timing liberalization within Asia Pacific. Such disparities raise problems of time consistency of liberalization under the so-called Bogor target of achieving free trade within APEC in 2010 (2020 for less advanced member states). Reliance on u201epeer pressureu201c as the only mechanism to commit member states to liberalization is seen as a weak driving force to make APECu2019s concerted unilateralism a stepping stone for the successor round of the Uruguay Round. The paper proposes a number of measures successfully applied in the EU to give APECu2019s liberalization more u201eteethu201c to the benefit of multilateral liberalization.
机译:本文讨论了过去欧盟在工业部门中具有约束力的内部自由化与亚太经济合作组织(APEC)成员国目前所谓的自愿性部门自由化之间的异同。尽管这两种方法与未经证实的单方面自由化相比都是第二好的方法,但自由化的APEC在工业部门中的主要缺点在于,由于亚太地区时间自由化的差距越来越大,导致部门之间以及成员国之间的扭曲。在所谓的茂物目标(2010年在亚太经合组织内实现自由贸易)(较不发达的成员国为2020年)之下,这种差距提出了自由化时间一致性的问题。依靠“极端压力”作为促使会员国实行自由化的唯一机制被认为是使亚太经合组织一致的单边主义成为乌拉圭回合后继回合的垫脚石的弱动力。本文提出了一系列在欧盟成功实施的措施,以使APEC的自由化更多,从而有利于多边自由化。

著录项

  • 作者

    Langhammer Rolf J.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 1998
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号