首页> 外文OA文献 >On the Increase of Background Seismicity Rate during the 1997-1998 Umbria-Marche, Central Italy, Sequence: Apparent Variation or Fluid-Driven Triggering?
【2h】

On the Increase of Background Seismicity Rate during the 1997-1998 Umbria-Marche, Central Italy, Sequence: Apparent Variation or Fluid-Driven Triggering?

机译:关于1997 - 1998年意大利中部翁布里亚 - 马尔凯地区背景地震活动率的增加,顺序:表观变化或流体驱动触发?

摘要

We investigate the temporal evolution of background seismicity rate in the Umbria-Marche sector of the northern Apennines that was struck by the 1997-98 Colfiorito seismic sequence. Specifically we apply the ETAS model to separate the background seismicity rate from the coseismic triggered rate of earthquake production. Analyzed data are extracted from the CSI1.1 catalog of Italian seismicity (1981-2002), which contains for the study area 12.163 events with ML > 1.5. The capability of the ETAS model to match the observed seismicity rate is tested by analyzing the model residuals and by applying two non-parametric statistical tests (the RUNS and the Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests) to verify the fit of residuals to Poisson hypothesis. We first apply the ETAS model to the seismicity occurred in the study area during the whole period covered by the CSI1.1 catalog. Our results show that the ETAS model does not explain the temporal evolution of seismicity in a time interval defined by change points identified from time-evolution of residuals and encompassing the Colfiorito seismic sequence. We therefore restrict our analysis to this period and analyze only those events belonging to the 1997-1998 seismic sequence. We again obtain the inadequacy of a stationary ETAS model with constant background rate to reproduce the temporal pattern of observed seismicity. We verify that the failure of ETAS model to fit the observed data is caused by the increase of the background seismicity rate associated with the repeated Colfiorito main shocks. We interpret the inferred increase of background rate as a consequence of the perturbation to the coseismic stress field caused by fluid flow and/or pore pressure relaxation. In particular we show that the transient perturbation caused by poroelastic relaxation can explain the temporal increase of background rate that therefore represents a fluid signal in the seismicity pattern.
机译:我们调查了1997-98年Colfiorito地震序列对亚平宁山脉北部Umbria-Marche区域背景地震活动率的时间演变。具体来说,我们应用ETAS模型将背景地震发生率与同震触发地震发生率分开。分析数据来自意大利地震活动的CSI1.1目录(1981-2002年),其中包含研究区域的ML> 1.5的12.163个事件。通过分析模型残差并应用两个非参数统计检验(RUNS和Kolmogorov-Smirnov检验)来验证残差与Poisson假设的拟合度,从而测试ETAS模型与观测到的地震活动率匹配的能力。我们首先将ETAS模型应用于CSI1.1目录涵盖的整个时期内研究区域内发生的地震活动。我们的结果表明,ETAS模型不能解释在从残差的时间演化确定的变化点所定义的时间间隔内的地震活动的时间演变,并涵盖了Colfiorito地震序列。因此,我们将分析限制在这一时期,仅分析属于1997-1998年地震序列的那些事件。我们再次获得了具有恒定背景速率的固定ETAS模型的不足,无法重现观测到的地震活动的时间模式。我们验证了ETAS模型无法拟合观察到的数据是由与重复的Colfiorito主震相关的背景地震活动率增加引起的。我们解释了由于流体流动和/或孔隙压力松弛引起的对同震应力场的扰动而导致的背景速率的增加。特别是,我们表明,由孔隙弹性松弛引起的瞬态扰动可以解释背景速率的瞬时增加,因此背景速率代表了地震活动模式中的流体信号。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号