首页> 外文OA文献 >‘Our power rests in numbers’. The role of expert-led policy processes in addressing water quality: the case of peri-urbanudareas in the national capital region of Delhi, India
【2h】

‘Our power rests in numbers’. The role of expert-led policy processes in addressing water quality: the case of peri-urbanudareas in the national capital region of Delhi, India

机译:“我们的力量取决于数字”。专家主导的政策过程在解决水质方面的作用:城市周边地区的情况印度德里国家首都地区的地区

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

This thesis explores the role of expert-led policy processes in addressing water quality. It does so by drawing on the ‘peri-urban’ as a setting which exemplifies contemporary social and environmental challenges associated with river and groundwater pollution, as well as the health and livelihood implications for the poorest citizens in peri-urban areas. The peri-urban area of Ghaziabad, on the outskirts of New Delhi, provides a good reference point for understanding those challenges, while India’s environmental regulatory agency (the Central Pollution Control Board) demonstrates how policy experts influence such a setting by enacting their institutional role and mandate.ududThe thesis examines the ways in which problems associated with deteriorating water quality in peri-urban areas are often neglected in expert-led policy processes, and the consequent implications for peri-urban poor communities. It argues that expert-driven policy approaches to addressing water quality are formulated almost exclusively on scientific grounds, while underlying ‘non-scientific’ decisions and choices, emerging from actors operating at levels from policy framing to policy implementation, are not awarded the same importance, thus ignoring issues that pertain to the social, environmental and political implications of the problems.ududBy drawing on qualitative research, the thesis focuses on two case studies. One examines the Central Pollution Control Board’s framing of policy initiatives while the other follows the implementation of such policies in peri-urban Ghaziabad. The thesis demonstrates how the scale of monitoring water quality is heavily biased towards national rather than local level priorities. This leads to an understatement of important water quality problems that affect peri-urban areas in favour of large-scale analyses of pollution in river basins. This has the effect of understating important water quality problems that affect peri-urban areas in poorer localities such as villages within the Ghaziabad district. The centrality of technical discourses in the articulation of and response to water quality problems makes it difficult for non-technical perspectives (derived directly from those people who are exposed to pollution) to feed into formal decision-making. This research also identified the key influence of a number of actors (municipal engineers, public health officials and district magistrates) in shaping and implementing policy outcomes on the ground in local contexts (i.e. peri-urban areas), even though their roles are often not recognised formally.ududThe thesis is original in its attempt to merge insights from policy studies and science technology studies (STS) and apply them to the domain of water quality, a field that has not traditionally been subjected to critical social science inquiry. It also unpacks ethnographically the Board’s dual role as both a policy advisor and regulator, and further illustrates how the enactment of these roles can lead to contradictory outcomes on the ground, particularly for the poorest periurban citizens.
机译:本文探讨了专家主导的政策过程在解决水质方面的作用。它是通过利用“城市周边”环境来实现的,它体现了与河流和地下水污染相关的当代社会和环境挑战,以及对城市周边地区最贫困公民的健康和生计影响。新德里郊区的加兹阿巴德郊区地区为理解这些挑战提供了很好的参考点,而印度的环境监管机构(中央污染控制委员会)则通过发挥机构作用来展示政策专家如何影响这种环境本文探讨了在专家主导的政策制定过程中经常忽略与城郊地区水质恶化相关的问题的方式,以及由此带来的对城郊贫困社区的影响。它认为,专家驱动的解决水质问题的政策方法几乎完全是基于科学基础制定的,而根本的“非科学”决策和选择(从从政策框架到政策实施的各个层面的行动者)产生的重要性却不同。因此,忽略了与问题的社会,环境和政治含义有关的问题。 ud ud通过定性研究,本文着重于两个案例研究。一个审查中央污染控制委员会对政策倡议的制定,而另一个审查在郊区加兹阿巴德实施此类政策的情况。本文证明了监测水质的规模如何严重偏重于国家而不是地方一级的优先事项。这导致对影响郊区地区的重要水质问题的轻描淡写,有利于对流域的污染进行大规模分析。这样做的效果是低估了重要的水质问题,这些问题会影响较贫困地区的城市周边地区,如加兹阿巴德地区的村庄。技术话语在水质问题的表达和应对中的中心地位,使得非技术性观点(直接来自那些受到污染的人们直接得出)很难进入正式的决策。这项研究还确定了一些行为者(市政工程师,公共卫生官员和地方行政官)在当地环境(即城市周边地区)在实地制定和实施政策成果方面的关键影响,尽管他们的角色通常不是 ud ud本论文的初衷是将政策研究和科学技术研究(STS)的见解进行合并,并将其应用于水质领域,而水质领域传统上并未受到社会科学的严格询问。它还从人种学角度揭示了董事会作为政策顾问和监管者的双重角色,并进一步说明了这些角色的制定如何导致实地矛盾的结果,尤其是对于最贫穷的城市郊区公民而言。

著录项

  • 作者

    Karpouzoglou Timothy;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2012
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号