首页> 外文OA文献 >Incentive Contracting versus Ownership Reforms: Evidence from China's Township and Village Enterprises
【2h】

Incentive Contracting versus Ownership Reforms: Evidence from China's Township and Village Enterprises

机译:激励契约与所有权改革:来自中国乡镇企业的证据

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We use a unique data set to study the implications of introducing managerial incentives and, in addition to incentives, better defined ownership for a firm's financial performance. The data set traces the ten-year history of 80 Chinese rural enterprises, known as township and village enterprises. During this period, these originally (mostly) community owned, local government controlled socialist collective firms were first allowed to introduce managerial incentive contracts and then to change to ownership forms of more clearly defined income and control rights. The study finds that introducing managerial incentives had a positive but statistically insignificant effect on these firms' performance measured by accounting return on assets or return on equity. It also finds that the performance is significantly better under ownership forms of better-defined rights than under community ownership even when the latter is supplemented with managerial incentive contracts. The findings shed lights on some important theoretical and policy issues.
机译:我们使用独特的数据集来研究引入管理激励措施的含义,除激励措施外,还可以更好地定义所有权对公司财务绩效的影响。数据集追溯了80个中国乡镇企业的十年历史。在此期间,这些最初(大部分)由社区所有,地方政府控制的社会主义集体企业首先被允许引入管理激励合同,然后转变为收入和控制权得到更明确定义的所有权形式。研究发现,采用管理激励措施对这些公司的绩效产生积极的影响,但在统计上却微不足道,这些影响可以通过会计资产收益率或权益收益率来衡量。它还发现,即使在定义了权利的所有权形式下,社区所有权与管理激励合同相辅相成,其绩效也明显好于社区所有权。研究结果为一些重要的理论和政策问题提供了启示。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号