首页> 外文OA文献 >Liquidity and hedging effectiveness under futures mispricing: International evidence
【2h】

Liquidity and hedging effectiveness under futures mispricing: International evidence

机译:期货错误定价下的流动性和对冲效力:国际证据

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We analyze the hedging effectiveness of positions that replicate stock indexes using corresponding futures contracts through the application of a dynamic, stochastic hedging strategy proposed by Lafuente, J. A. and Novales, A. (2003). Conclusive gains do not emerge in any of the markets analyzed over the period considered, relative to the use of a constant unit hedge ratio. These findings are consistent with the trend observed in the IBEX 35 futures market study of Lafuente, J. A. and Novales, A. (2003). Our empirical evidence suggests that, contrary to what happens in less liquid markets, the discrepancy between theoretical and quoted prices in index futures contracts in fully developed markets does not represent a noise factor that can be successfully exploited for hedging.
机译:通过应用由Lafuente,J. A.和Novales,A.(2003)提出的动态,随机对冲策略,我们分析了使用相应的期货合约复制股票指数的头寸的对冲有效性。相对于使用恒定单位套期保值比率而言,在所考虑的期间内,在任何分析的市场中都没有最终收益。这些发现与Lafuente,J.A.和Novales,A.(2003)的IBEX 35期货市场研究中观察到的趋势一致。我们的经验证据表明,与流动性较低的市场中发生的情况相反,完全发达市场中指数期货合约的理论价格与报价之间的差异并不代表可以成功用于套期保值的噪声因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号