首页> 外文OA文献 >L’economia italiana post-coloniale in Etiopia ed Eritrea. 1941-1974
【2h】

L’economia italiana post-coloniale in Etiopia ed Eritrea. 1941-1974

机译:埃塞俄比亚和厄立特里亚的后殖民意大利经济。 1941年至1974年

摘要

How did bilateral relations between Italy and Ethiopia-Eritrea evolved after the colonial period? What was the impact of the Italian economic presence on the economy of Ethiopia and Eritrea in the post-colonial period? Why since the end of the World War II has been existing in Ethiopia a widespread pro-Italian judgment despite the colonial past? The purpose of this research is to answer to such questions.udDescription of the researchudChapter 1 is dedicated to the evolution of the bilateral relations between Italy and Ethiopia between 1947 and 1955. The Treaty of Peace, signed in Paris on February 10, 1947, imposed to Italy, among the other provisions, the recognition of the independence of Ethiopia, the renouncement of claims to colonies including Eritrea and the payment of war reparations to Ethiopia. These issues took time to be actually solved. Especially with regard to the future of Eritrea the tensions between Italy and Ethiopia flared up despite the fact that diplomatic relations were resumed at the beginning of 1952. In addition there were complex negotiations on the amount of the war reparations to be paid. Finally, the artworks carried away from Ethiopia during the occupation period were returned with delay and in several tranches between 1954 and 2005. As a general consideration, the whole picture of the bilateral relations between 1947 and the beginning of the ‘70s shows the alternation of long periods of strong tension with shorter ones of détente.udChapter 2 and 3 outline the main characteristics and the evolution of the Italian economic presence in Ethiopia and in Eritrea between 1941 and 1974. The first years after 1941 were extremely troubled. Many Italians were expelled from the two countries, many were confined to concentration camps, and in Ethiopia many became clandestines in order not to be forced to leave the country. In the late ‘40s, Italians in Eritrea became the target of terrorist actions by the shifta. Many Italians were killed and several companies managed by them were destroyed or seriously damaged. Italians went through other serious difficulties in the early ‘70s when the growing guerrilla made Eritrea highly insecure. Despite these difficulties Italians kept on carrying out their activities that flourished in the ‘50s and the ‘60s but were decimated by the nationalizations of the Derg during the first half of the ‘70s.udMain ResultsudWith regard to the bilateral relations Italian diplomatic documents show the will of both parties to reach an agreement on the post war issues. However it was a very tough negotiation, as expected. In contrast to the belief expressed in some relevant and well-known works, i.e. Del Boca’s one, the complexity of such a negotiation seems to be due more to the Ethiopian tactics than to the alleged Italian purpose to delay the final settlement. Furthermore it is crystal clear that one of the top priority of the Italian Government in negotiating was to protect the Italian communities in Ethiopia and Eritrea. This result is in contrast with what affirmed by Del Boca in particular, who stressed a sort of lack of interest of Italy in the co-nationals resident in the two countries.ududChapter 2 and 3 shows that the efforts of Italians workers and entrepreneurs in Ethiopia and Eritrea after the end of the occupation are worthy of note and memory. Such efforts testify to an extraordinary commitment. Italians arrived in Ethiopia and Eritrea with dreams and hopes that many were finally able to see come true. Some of their stories are uniquely interesting.udEmperor Haile Selassie undoubtedly played a significant role in fostering the rapid development of Italian economic activities and in shaping fruitful and cooperative relations between Italians and Ethiopians. He protected the Italians because he was deeply convinced of the important economic role that Italians would still have been able to play in Ethiopia, not only in the early post-occupation period, but also for the future of the country.udItalian economic presence was strong in quantity and quality both in Ethiopia and Eritrea. However it is quite clear that throughout the period between 1941 and 1974 the incidence of Italian economic activities was significantly higher in Eritrea than Ethiopia. Italian firms were modern and efficient, and they were the backbone of the economy of Eritrea. The higher impact of our entrepreneurs in Eritrea was due to the longer stay of Eritrea itself under the Italian Government, which resulted in a much larger Italian community in Eritrea than in Ethiopia, both in absolute and relative terms.udAlmost the entire industrial and advanced agricultural sectors in Eritrea was in hands of the Italians. Provided that at the beginning of the ‘50s, the 80% of manufacturing plants of the Ethio-Eritrean Federation was based in Eritrea, it must concluded that the incidence of the Italian companies in the whole industrial sector was huge. In addition, except for the Italian activities, there were only a few other companies, especially in the agricultural and commercial sectors, managed by Eritreans or expatriates of other communities. In agriculture, where traditional ways and means of cultivation and a subsistence production still prevailed, the big agricultural and agro-processing companies run by the Italians were extraordinarily efficient. The Italians used modern techniques and machinery. They diversified their production. They also built dams, irrigation systems and major infrastructure projects for the reclamation of land to production. Even before the 50's and increasingly in the following decades, the Italian agricultural firms were able to export to neighboring markets, after meeting domestic demand. For the rest, the Eritrean economy was based on subsistence and largely unproductive agriculture.udItalian activities strongly contributed to the national economy. In the economy of the Empire, characterized by a very low incidence of industrial development and the export of a few agricultural products (coffee, hides, oilseeds), the production for export made by Italian companies represented a unique economic opportunity for the entire country. The contribution of Italian economic activities was more evident in Eritrea than in Ethiopia. According to many sources, if Eritrean exports and imports would have been precisely accounted for - that is without considering the value of the goods that passed through Eritrea, but whose final destination was Ethiopia - Eritrea’s trade deficit would have been significantly reduced or even zeroed out. Furthermore, the presence of flourishing Italian companies had positive repercussions also on the Eritrean state budget thanks to the taxud5udincome they produced. By the way, the rates applied to Italian companies were much higher than those applied to local ones.udThe Italian business elite was also able to translate in images the social renewal processes of the 50’s and the 60’s. The buildings designed by Arturo Mezzedimi were perhaps the most evident symbols of such ability. Such buildings represented the avant-garde architecture of those years. Another building contractor, Mario Buschi, very active throughout the Empire, highly contributed to shape the modern image of Addis Ababa.udThe statistics shows that from 1957 to 1974 Italy was, together with USA, the main commercial partner of the Ethiopian Empire. Even in the period 1941-1951, during which official diplomatic relations between Italy and Ethiopia were absent, the bilateral trade was relevant and in particular Italy was in those years the first importer from Ethiopia. These exceptional results were due indeed to Italian resident community that with its economic activities highly contributed to nurture commercial flows from and to Italy.udThe good relations between the Italians who remained after 1941 and the Ethiopians played a decisive role in rapidly archiving the memory of the Italians as colonizers. Indeed such relationship was generally dominated by a constructive spirit of cooperation and probably fueled by some deep affinity of character between our two peoples. They were the Italians that contributed to maintain a good image of Italy in Ethiopia even during the absence of official diplomatic relations or at times of misunderstandings and difficulties in the dialogue between the two governments. In decades of coexistence the Italians and Ethiopians have been able to establish a fruitful dialogue, marked by mutual understanding, esteem and respect. Workplaces were the main venue where such a dialogue has taken its shape.udThe author spent 4 years in Ethiopia, from 2008 to 2012, as head of the commercial section of the Italian Embassy. This experience allowed her to learn parts of the history of the Italian community in Ethiopia and in Eritrea between 1941 and 1974 directly from the present generations of Italian businessmen resident in Ethiopia. The author also had the opportunity to consult Italians’ personal archives in which she could find documents and books that are not anymore on the market and difficult to find in libraries. Her personal experience and knowledge of the country and the people added depth to this work that is however based almost exclusively on written sources.
机译:殖民时期之后,意大利与埃塞俄比亚-厄立特里亚之间的双边关系是如何发展的?在后殖民时期,意大利的经济存在对埃塞俄比亚和厄立特里亚的经济产生了什么影响?为什么自第二次世界大战以来在埃塞俄比亚一直存在着广泛的支持意大利人的判断,尽管殖民时代过去了?本研究的目的是回答这些问题。 ud研究的描述 ud第1章致力于1947年至1955年意大利与埃塞俄比亚之间的双边关系的演变。2月10日在巴黎签署的《和平条约》, 1947年,除其他规定外,意大利还承认埃塞俄比亚的独立性,放弃对包括厄立特里亚在内的殖民地的主权要求,并向埃塞俄比亚支付战争赔款。这些问题需要时间才能真正解决。特别是关于厄立特里亚的未来,尽管事实上在1952年初恢复了外交关系,但意大利和埃塞俄比亚之间的紧张局势还是加剧了。此外,就战争赔款的数额进行了复杂的谈判。最终,占领时期从埃塞俄比亚运出的艺术品被延迟归还,并在1954年至2005年之间分几批退还。作为一般考虑,从1947年到70年代初的双边关系的整体图景显示: ud第2章和第3章概述了1941年至1974年之间意大利在埃塞俄比亚和厄立特里亚的主要特征及其经济发展。1941年后的头几年非常麻烦。许多意大利人被驱逐出两国,许多人被限制在集中营,在埃塞俄比亚,许多人成为秘密人,以免被迫离开该国。在20世纪40年代后期,厄立特里亚的意大利人成为大事记恐怖袭击的目标。许多意大利人被杀,他们管理的几家公司被摧毁或严重破坏。在70年代初期,当游击队不断壮大使厄立特里亚变得极度不安全时,意大利人经历了其他严重的困难。尽管存在这些困难,意大利人仍继续开展自己的活动,这些活动在50年代和60年代蓬勃发展,但在70年代上半叶被德尔格(Derg)的国有化所淹没。 ud主要结果 ud关于双边关系,意大利外交文件显示了双方在战后问题上达成协议的意愿。但是,正如预期的那样,这是一次非常艰难的谈判。与某些相关的著名作品(即德尔·博卡的作品)表达的信念相反,这种谈判的复杂性似乎更多是由于埃塞俄比亚的策略,而不是归因于意大利所谓的延迟最后解决的目的。此外,显而易见的是,意大利政府进行谈判的首要任务之一是保护埃塞俄比亚和厄立特里亚的意大利社区。这一结果与德尔·博卡(Del Boca)特别强调的相反,德尔·博卡(Del Boca)强调意大利对两国居民的共同国民缺乏兴趣。 ud ud第2章和第3章表明,意大利工人和工人的努力占领结束后埃塞俄比亚和厄立特里亚的企业家值得关注和记忆。这种努力证明了一个非凡的承诺。意大利人梦dream以求地抵达埃塞俄比亚和厄立特里亚,并希望许多人最终能够实现。 ud皇帝海尔·塞拉西(Haile Selassie)无疑在促进意大利经济活动的迅速发展以及在建立意大利人与埃塞俄比亚人之间富有成果的合作关系方面发挥了重要作用。他之所以保护意大利人,是因​​为他深信意大利人仍然可以在埃塞俄比亚发挥重要的经济作用,不仅在占领后初期,而且在该国的未来。埃塞俄比亚和厄立特里亚的数量和质量都很高。但是,很明显,在1941年至1974年的整个期间,厄立特里亚的意大利经济活动发生率明显高于埃塞俄比亚。意大利的公司现代化,高效,是厄立特里亚经济的支柱。我们的企业家在厄立特里亚的影响更大,是因为厄立特里亚本身在意大利政府的统治下待了更长的时间,这导致厄立特里亚的意大利人群体在绝对和相对方面都比埃塞俄比亚大得多。厄立特里亚的农业部门掌握在意大利人手中。假设在50年代初,埃塞俄比亚厄立特里亚联邦80%的制造工厂都设在厄立特里亚,则必须得出结论,意大利公司在整个工业领域的影响巨大。此外除了意大利的业务外,只有少数几家公司由厄立特里亚人或其他社区的侨民管理,尤其是在农业和商业领域。在农业方面,传统的耕种方式和手段仍占主导地位,自给自足的生产,由意大利人经营的大型农业和农产品加工公司效率极高。意大利人使用了现代技术和机械。他们使生产多样化。他们还建造了水坝,灌溉系统和大型基础设施项目,以开垦土地生产。甚至在50年代之前,并在随后的几十年中不断增长,意大利的农业公司在满足国内需求之后便能够出口到周边市场。其余方面,厄立特里亚经济以生存为基础,很大程度上是非生产性农业。 udalian的活动为国民经济做出了重要贡献。在帝国主义经济中,工业发展的发生率很低,很少有农产品(咖啡,生皮,油料种子)的出口,意大利公司生产的出口产品代表了整个国家的独特经济机会。意大利经济活动的贡献在厄立特里亚比在埃塞俄比亚更明显。根据许多消息来源,如果本来可以准确地说明厄立特里亚的进出口,即不考虑通过厄立特里亚但最终目的地是埃塞俄比亚的商品的价值,则厄立特里亚的贸易赤字将大大减少,甚至为零。 。此外,蓬勃发展的意大利公司的存在对厄立特里亚国家预算也产生了积极的影响,这要归功于它们产生的税收 ud5 udincome。顺便说一句,适用于意大利公司的费率比适用于本地公司的费率要高得多。 ud意大利的商业精英们还可以将50年代和60年代的社会更新过程转换成图像。 Arturo Mezzedimi设计的建筑物也许是这种能力的最明显标志。这样的建筑代表了那几年的前卫建筑。另一个建筑承包商马里奥·布希(Mario Buschi)在整个帝国期间非常活跃,为塑造亚的斯亚贝巴的现代形象做出了重要贡献。 ud统计数据显示,从1957年至1974年,意大利与美国一起成为埃塞俄比亚帝国的主要商业伙伴。即使在1941-1951年期间,意大利和埃塞俄比亚之间也没有正式的外交关系,但双边贸易还是很重要的,尤其是那年意大利是埃塞俄比亚的第一个进口国。这些非凡的成就的确归功于意大利居民社区,因为其经济活动极大地促进了进出意大利的商业流动。 ud在1941年之后仍然留任的意大利人与埃塞俄比亚人之间的良好关系在迅速存档对埃塞俄比亚人的记忆方面起着决定性作用。意大利人是殖民者。实际上,这种关系通常以建设性的合作精神为主导,并且可能由我们两国人民之间某些深厚的性格亲和力所推动。他们是意大利人,即使在没有正式的外交关系或在两国政府之间的对话中存在误解和困难时,也为维持意大利在埃塞俄比亚的良好形象做出了贡献。在几十年的共处中,意大利人和埃塞俄比亚人能够建立富有成果的对话,其特点是相互理解,尊重和尊重。工作场所是进行这种对话的主要场所。 ud作者于2008年至2012年在埃塞俄比亚工作了4年,担任意大利大使馆商务部负责人。这段经历使她可以直接从居住在埃塞俄比亚的当代意大利商人那里学习1941年至1974年之间在埃塞俄比亚和厄立特里亚的意大利社区的部分历史。作者还有机会对意大利人的个人档案进行了咨询,在其中她可以找到不再在市场上并且很难在图书馆中找到的文档和书籍。她对国家和人民的亲身经历和知识为这项工作增添了深度,但几乎完全基于书面资料。

著录项

  • 作者

    Santangelo Maria Letizia;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2015
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号