首页> 外文OA文献 >Access to essential medicines: in Pakistan identifying policy research and concerns
【2h】

Access to essential medicines: in Pakistan identifying policy research and concerns

机译:获得基本药物:在巴基斯坦确定政策研究和关注

摘要

The fundamental importance of ensuring access to medicines, particularly for the poor, is reflected in MDG 8 however remains poor in many low and middle income countries (LMICs). Country specific evidence on access to medicines is weak in LMICs and research has rarely been from an integrated health systems perspective. This study used an evidence based approach to identify key priority concerns and emerging research questions related to access to medicines in Pakistan. WHO’s Access to Medicine Framework was used as the conceptual basis for data collection on rational usage, affordability, financing and health systems. Methods involved a systematic desk review, in-depth stakeholder interviews and a consensus building Roundtable exercise. In Pakistan there has been considerable work in terms of medicines related policy acts and operative guidelines. However considerable gaps exist between policy and practice and between medicine policies and health systems strategies. Average number of medications prescribed is higher than other LMICs and prescription practices frequently do not follow standard recommended therapies from specialists down to general practitioners. There is a widely entrenched private informal sector and shadow pharmacies which remains largely unregulated. Spending on drugs is mainly borne by households, accounts for 63% of total spending on drugs in Pakistan as compared to only 18% in OECD countries and can lead to catastrophic household expenditure. Medicine therapy for chronic care is particularly unaffordable even with use of low cost generics. Within the public sector, availability of essential generics is extremely low at 3.3% as compared to 29-54% in LMICs. Public sector spending on drugs is far below the minimum $2 per capita indicated for LMICs and existing spending faces issues of questionable adherence to EDL, low quality drugs and outdated logistics management systems. Contracting out the management of BHUs has resulted in better medicine availability. There is serious shortage of trained manpower pharmacists across private and public sector with 0.9 pharmacist / 100000 population in Pakistan far below recommended ratio of 1 pharmacist per 2000 population. Drug regulation also requires with registration of excessive number of drugs, wide quality variation in quality and pricing, and frequent instances of spurious drugs and black marketing. Chronic shortage of low prices essential medicines is a long standing issue linked to disincentive to production due to low pricing and flat price control. The above policy concerns raise need for research in key areas. First, there is need for surveys on continuous surveillance of policy impact on availability, price and affordability of medicines; mapping of private informal sector and shadow pharmacies; and consumer health seeking preferences. Second, collation is required of best practice lessons on registration, pricing, market vigilance and enhancement of rational drug use. Third, operation research pilots in key areas such as alternative health financing mechanisms involving commodity voucher, GP contracting, pre-payment schemes, equity funds for increasing drug availability and affordability; scientific improvement of logistics management system in public sector; and introducing community participation in accountability mechanisms. Pharmaceutical policy and research needs to be centrally placed within larger health systems related initiatives. It needs to be accompanied by sustained dialogue and interaction between multiple stakeholders including private sector. Adequate steps also need to be taken to ensure a continuous culture of research feeding into evidence based policies
机译:千年发展目标8反映了确保特别是穷人获得药品的根本重要性,但在许多低收入和中等收入国家(LMIC)仍然很贫穷。在低收入和中低收入国家中,有关获得药物的国家特定证据薄弱,从综合卫生系统的角度来看,研究很少。这项研究采用了基于证据的方法,以确定与巴基斯坦获得药品有关的主要优先事项和新兴研究问题。世卫组织的《获取药物框架》被用作收集合理使用,可负担性,筹资和卫生系统数据的概念基础。方法包括系统的案头审查,利益相关者的深入访谈和建立共识圆桌会议。在巴基斯坦,与药物有关的政策法案和实施指南方面开展了大量工作。但是,政策与实践之间,医药政策与卫生系统战略之间仍然存在巨大差距。开处方的平均药物数量高于其他中低收入国家,开处方的实践经常不遵循从专家到普通医生的标准推荐疗法。有一个根深蒂固的私营非正规部门和影子药店,基本上没有受到监管。毒品支出主要由家庭负担,占巴基斯坦毒品总支出的63%,而经合组织国家仅为18%,这可能导致灾难性的家庭支出。即使使用低成本的仿制药,用于慢性病的药物治疗也特别难以承受。在公共部门内,基本仿制药的可用性极低,仅为3.3%,而中低收入国家只有29-54%。公共部门在药品上的支出远远低于中低收入国家所指出的人均最低支出2美元,而现有支出面临着人们对EDL,低质量药品和过时的物流管理系统的依从性问题。将BHU的管理承包出去可以带来更好的药品供应。私营和公共部门的训练有素的人力药剂师严重短缺,巴基斯坦的药剂师/ 100 000人中有0.9名药剂师,远低于每2000名人口推荐的1名药剂师的比率。药品监管还要求注册过多数量的药品,质量和价格上存在很大差异的质量,以及经常出现虚假药品和黑市现象。长期以来,低价基本药物的短缺是长期存在的问题,与低价和统一价格控制导致抑制生产有关。上述政策关注引起对关键领域研究的需求。首先,需要对政策对药物的可获得性,价格和可负担性的影响进行持续监测的调查;绘制私营非正规部门和影子药店的图;和消费者健康寻求偏好。其次,需要对注册,定价,市场警惕和加强合理用药方面的最佳实践课程进行整理。第三,在关键领域进行运营研究试点,例如涉及商品券的替代性健康融资机制,全科医生合同,预付款计划,增加药品供应和负担能力的股权基金;科学完善公共部门的物流管理体系;并使社区参与问责机制。药品政策和研究需要集中在与卫生系统相关的更大计划中。它需要伴随着包括私营部门在内的多个利益相关者之间的持续对话和互动。还需要采取足够的步骤来确保研究的持续文化融入基于证据的政策中

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号