首页> 外文OA文献 >International actors and traditional justice in Sub-Saharan Africa :policies and interventions in transitional justice and justice sector aid
【2h】

International actors and traditional justice in Sub-Saharan Africa :policies and interventions in transitional justice and justice sector aid

机译:撒哈拉以南非洲的国际行动者和传统司法:过渡时期司法和司法部门援助的政策和干预措施

摘要

Due to a number of important differences between transitional justice and justice sector aid, this book explored how international actors address ‘traditional justice’ in these fields in two distinct parts, which has led to separate analyses. Justicesector aid is often part of broader development cooperation programmes, which may or may not take place in a ost-conflict country. Transitional justice processes are part of conflict-related international interventions, such as peacebuildingprogrammes, which are often implemented before the wheels of more longterm development cooperation programmes are set in motion. Chronologically speaking, both kinds of programmes – support for transitional justice and justice sector aid – often do not run parallel, although there can be overlaps. It alsoturns out that the international actors are not necessarily the same. Although in principle the same donor countries are involved, justice sector aid is often provided by bilateral or multilateral development organisations, while transitional justiceinterventions are more often – but certainly not exclusively – initiatives of specific agencies aimed at post-conflict reconstruction, which are established by several donor countries. Although respect for human rights is heavily emphasised in both domains, policy and interventions regarding transitional justice also need to take international norms regarding the criminal prosecution of international crimesinto account. In spite of these differences, this concluding chapter formulates a number of mutual findings and recommendations. First, it discusses common elements at the level of policies, then it identifies a number of trends regardinginterventions, and finally it examines the way in which linternational actors handle the tension between traditional justice and human rights.
机译:由于过渡时期司法与司法部门援助之间存在许多重要差异,因此本书探讨了国际行为者如何在两个不同的部分中解决这些领域中的“传统司法”问题,从而进行了单独的分析。司法部门的援助往往是更广泛的发展合作方案的一部分,该方案可能在或不会在一个相互冲突的国家进行。过渡时期司法程序是与冲突有关的国际干预措施的一部分,例如建设和平方案,这些干预措施通常是在启动更长期的发展合作方案之轮之前实施的。从时间顺序上讲,这两种方案(对过渡司法的支持和司法部门的援助)通常不会并行运行,尽管可能会有重叠。事实证明,国际行为者不一定相同。尽管原则上涉及相同的捐助国,但司法部门的援助通常是由双边或多边发展组织提供的,而过渡时期司法干预则更多地(但当然不是唯一地)是针对冲突后重建的特定机构的倡议,这些倡议是由几个捐助国。尽管在这两个领域都强调尊重人权,但有关过渡时期司法的政策和干预措施也需要考虑到有关对国际罪行的刑事起诉的国际规范。尽管存在这些差异,但本章最后还是提出了一些共同的发现和建议。首先,它讨论了政策层面的共同要素,然后,确定了有关干预的多种趋势,最后,它研究了国际行为体处理传统司法与人权之间紧张关系的方式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号