首页> 外文OA文献 >The rejection of AV is the fifth occasion in the last 100 years that a proposal to replace FPTP has failed. This history of failure to secure electoral reform hinges on the ever-changing political calculus between Labour and the Liberal Democrats
【2h】

The rejection of AV is the fifth occasion in the last 100 years that a proposal to replace FPTP has failed. This history of failure to secure electoral reform hinges on the ever-changing political calculus between Labour and the Liberal Democrats

机译:AV的拒绝是过去100年中第五次替换FPTP的提案失败。未能进行选举改革的历史取决于工党与自由民主党之间不断变化的政治演算

摘要

Throughout the AV referendum campaign, there was general agreement that it was a ‘once-in-a-generation’ opportunity for electoral reform in Britain. But, does greater impetus for electoral reform happen only once in a generation? Stuart Wilks-Heeg, of Democratic Audit, investigates the history of proposals to replace our current First Past the Post system, and finds that the shifting balance of power between parties on the left created possibilities for reform in previous decades. If Labour and the Liberal Democrats are able to find common ground on this issue in the coming years, then electoral reform will remain firmly on the table.
机译:在全民投票的整个过程中,人们普遍认为这是英国选举改革的“千载难逢”的机会。但是,选举改革的更大动力难道只有一代人发生过一次吗?民主审计的斯图尔特·威尔克斯·海格(Stuart Wilks-Heeg)研究了取代我们当前的“过去任职制”的提议的历史,并发现左翼政党之间权力平衡的转移为过去几十年的改革创造了可能性。如果工党和自由民主党能够在未来几年中在这个问题上找到共同点,那么选举改革将牢牢地摆在桌面上。

著录项

  • 作者

    Wilks-Heeg Stuart;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2011
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号