首页> 外文OA文献 >The boundary commission for England has been unnecessarily radical in its proposals, often ignoring local government boundaries. New constituencies may lack community cohesion and local loyalty
【2h】

The boundary commission for England has been unnecessarily radical in its proposals, often ignoring local government boundaries. New constituencies may lack community cohesion and local loyalty

机译:英格兰的边界委员会在其提议中过于激进,常常无视地方政府的边界。新选区可能缺乏社区凝聚力和当地忠诚度

摘要

Last week, the Boundary Commission for England presented its proposals for newudconstituencies based on 600 rather than 650 parliamentary seats. Democratic Audit’s LewisudBaston undertook a parallel analysis in June, and while he finds some similarities, heudargues that the Commission may create tri-borough seats, orphan wards and the crossing ofudthe boundaries of upper-tier authorities and counties, which may lead to seats that have littleudor no community cohesion.
机译:上周,英格兰边界委员会根据600个而不是650个议会席位提出了关于新选区的提议。民主审计的Lewis udBaston于6月份进行了平行分析,尽管他发现了一些相似之处,但他认为委员会可能会创建三区席,孤儿病区以及跨越上层主管部门和县的边界,可能导致席位几乎没有或没有社区凝聚力。

著录项

  • 作者

    Baston Lewis;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2011
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号