首页> 外文OA文献 >Uniting forest and livelihood outcomes? Analyzing external actor interventions in sustainable livelihoods in a community forest management context
【2h】

Uniting forest and livelihood outcomes? Analyzing external actor interventions in sustainable livelihoods in a community forest management context

机译:统一森林和生计成果?在社区森林管理背景下分析外部参与者对可持续生计的干预

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

External actor interventions in community forest management (CFM) attempt to support communities with developing forest institutions and/or improving their livelihoods portfolio. Common pool resource (CPR) scholars argue that forest institutions are required to prevent overharvesting of the forest resource stock (appropriation dilemma), and to encourage investment in its maintenance (provision dilemma). The sustainable livelihoods approach (SLA) has been widely used to analyse the influence of interventions on rural livelihoods portfolios. As interventions in CFM span the academic divide between CPR and SLA literatures, analysis of such interventions through either a CPR or SLA lens risks overlooking intervention activities, significant outcomes of the intervention, and the interplay between these outcomes. We propose here an analytical framework which combines CPR and SLA insights and ascertain its applicability by analysing interventions in a forest dependent community in Andhra Pradesh, India. We developed multiple indicators to measure the community’s ability to deal with appropriation and provision dilemmas, and their livelihoods portfolio. Using data from forest plots, household questionnaires, focus group meetings and interviews, we analysed the intervention approaches, activities and outcomes. Our results show that a community’s ability to deal with appropriation and provision dilemmas both affects, and is affected by its livelihoods portfolio. These intricate and dynamic interplays strongly influence the direct and indirect outcomes of intervention activities. Incorporating the synergy between the CPR and SLA perspectives in our analytical framework led us to a much more nuanced understanding of intervention approaches, activities and outcomes than would have otherwise been gained from a single perspective framework.
机译:外部参与者对社区森林管理(CFM)的干预试图通过发展森林机构和/或改善其生计组合来支持社区。共同资源库(CPR)的学者认为,必须建立森林机构来防止森林资源库的过度采伐(盗用两难),并鼓励对其维护进行投资(供应两难)。可持续生计方法(SLA)已被广泛用于分析干预措施对农村生计组合的影响。由于CFM的干预措施跨越了CPR和SLA文献之间的学术鸿沟,因此通过CPR或SLA镜头对此类干预措施进行分析可能会忽视干预措施的活动,干预措施的重大成果以及这些成果之间的相互影响。我们在这里提出一个分析框架,该框架结合了CPR和SLA的见解,并通过分析印度安得拉邦森林依赖社区的干预措施来确定其适用性。我们开发了多个指标来衡量社区应对拨款和准备金困境及其生计组合的能力。利用森林地块,家庭调查表,焦点小组会议和访谈中的数据,我们分析了干预方法,活动和结果。我们的结果表明,社区应对拨款和准备金困境的能力既影响着生计资产,也受到生计资产的影响。这些复杂而动态的相互作用强烈影响干预活动的直接和间接结果。将CPR和SLA观点之间的协同作用纳入我们的分析框架,使我们对干预方法,活动和结果的了解比从单一观点框架获得的更加细微的了解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号