首页> 外文OA文献 >The instrumental use of technical doubts: technological controversies, investment decisions and air pollution controls in the global shipping industry
【2h】

The instrumental use of technical doubts: technological controversies, investment decisions and air pollution controls in the global shipping industry

机译:技术疑惑的工具性使用:全球航运业中的技术争议,投资决策和空气污染控制

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In principle, the installation of emissions abatement technology (otherwise known as scrubbers) on ships would reduce air pollution and premature deaths from disease and allow vessels to save costs by continuing to burn cheap high-sulphur residual fuel oil. But very few scrubbers have been installed. A recent House of Commons Select Committee Inquiry was unable to decide between the competing technical claims of scrubber manufacturers and ship operators, over whether scrubber technology was sufficiently 'mature' for present installation. From the perspective of science and technology studies, this paper draws on interviews with stakeholders and written and oral evidence to the committee to argue that this was a dispute which foregrounded technical arguments for investment decisions that were actually being made on economic grounds. Where scientific/technical closure is a matter of communal understanding rather than technical demonstration, technical doubt can be used instrumentally for economic reasons to delay closure.
机译:原则上,在船舶上安装减排技术(也称为洗涤塔)将减少空气污染和疾病造成的过早死亡,并使船舶通过继续燃烧廉价的高硫残留燃料油来节省成本。但是几乎没有安装洗涤器。上议院最近进行的下属委员会调查无法确定洗涤器制造商和船舶运营商之间的竞争性技术主张,即洗涤器技术对于目前的安装是否足够“成熟”。从科学技术研究的角度出发,本文利用与利益相关者的访谈以及向委员会的书面和口头证据,认为这是一场争端,提出了基于经济理由实际进行投资决策的技术论点。如果科学/技术的关闭是公众理解的问题,而不是技术示范的问题,则出于经济原因,可以用技术疑问来延迟关闭。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号