首页> 外文OA文献 >High-engagement philanthropy: the grantee’s perspective
【2h】

High-engagement philanthropy: the grantee’s perspective

机译:高参与度的慈善事业:受赠人的观点

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

In the 1990s, the practice of high-engagement philanthropy emerged as a topic of debate amongst the United States ‘foundation community’. Since then, it has become a common method of grantmaking among many funders. Foundations that adopt this grantmaking style – one in which they work in close partnership with their grantees – claim to create greater impact by significantly increasing the operating capacity of the organizations that they fund. Proponents of the practice have written extensively on the need for longer-term, larger grants that include technical assistance and contingent funding plans. Other perhaps more cynical observers suggest that ‘high-engagement philanthropy,’ at times termed ‘venture philanthropy’, is simply a new name for a style of grantmaking that has existed for decades. They also doubt whether it is more effective than ‘traditional’ grantmaking in which funders offer little more than a cheque and maintain minimal oversight after the grant has been awarded. To date, research has not analyzed high-engagement philanthropy from the point of view of grant recipients. The discourse so far has centred on why funders themselves should, or should not employ a high-engagement style. The purpose of this paper, therefore, is to bring grantees into the discourse on high-engagement philanthropy in order to begin to understand the benefits and costs from their point of view. It focuses on one set of high-engagement grants given to a group of early childhood education centres in a small city in the U.S. state of Pennsylvania. The five grant recipients interviewed for the study strongly supported the high-engagement nature of the grants in question, and also indicated that, in general, they preferred a high-engagement approach to philanthropy. Although there are a number of limitations that arise from focusing on such a small set of grantees and one set of grants, it is hoped that this research will stimulate further inquiries into high-engagement philanthropy from the viewpoint of the grant recipient.
机译:在1990年代,高参与度的慈善行为已成为美国“基金会界”的辩论主题。从那时起,它已成为许多资助者中常见的赠款方式。采取这种捐赠方式的基金会(与捐赠者紧密合作的基金会)声称通过显着提高其资助的组织的运营能力来产生更大的影响。支持这种做法的人大量写了关于需要更大,更长期的赠款的书,其中包括技术援助和应急资金计划。其他也许更愤世嫉俗的观察家认为,“高参与度的慈善事业”(有时被称为“冒险慈善事业”)只是一种已经存在了数十年的赠款方式的新名称。他们还怀疑这是否比“传统”赠款更有效,在传统赠款中,出资者仅提供支票,并且在赠款被授予后保持最小的监督。迄今为止,研究还没有从赠款接受者的角度分析高参与度的慈善事业。到目前为止,讨论集中在为什么资助者自己应该或不应该采用高度参与的风格。因此,本文的目的是将受赠人带入高参与度慈善事业的讨论中,以便从他们的角度开始理解收益和成本。它着重于向美国宾夕法尼亚州一个小城市中的一组幼儿教育中心提供的一组高参与度补助金。接受采访的五位接受研究的赠款接受者强烈支持所涉赠款的高度参与性,并指出,总体而言,他们更倾向于采用高度参与性的慈善方式。尽管关注如此少量的受赠者和一组赠款存在许多限制,但是希望该研究将激发从赠款接受者的角度进一步探讨高参与度慈善事业。

著录项

  • 作者

    Herrold Catherine;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2006
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号