首页> 外文OA文献 >Reconsidering State-Society Relations in South Asia: A Himalayan Case Study
【2h】

Reconsidering State-Society Relations in South Asia: A Himalayan Case Study

机译:重新考虑南亚国家与社会关系:喜马拉雅案例研究

摘要

Since the mid-eighteenth century when armies serving the English East India Company (EIC) clashed with the Gorkhali power, British officers depicted Nepal as an example of classical Hindu despotism. Subsequent scholars of the region have not challenged these representations, taking such colonial descriptors as ‘facts.’ The portrayal of the centralized and ‘despotic’ state in South Asian pasts rests upon a certain understanding of the state’s relationship with society. It calls for imagining the Gorkhali regime as alien to the rest of society and supposing that ethnicity and caste are inflexible from one century to the next. The excessive attention given to land systems and revenue extraction to understand the early Gorkhali state formation has equally left us with a limited narrative that is conspicuous for its absence of non-fiscal elements of state making. The frequency and volume of state-society interactions as gleaned from the documents of the period however belie static depiction of power and rule in nineteenth century Nepal. This essay, building on previously unstudied sources, replaces the picture of a static ‘Hindu’despotic state with one that responded to its entanglement with internal and external forces, and put together, piece by piece, a Hindu polity out of a plural society along the Himalayan foothills. The resulting order was processual not a homeostatic structure. Gorkhali rulers succeeded in projecting their power through intertwined strategies of literary and religious patronage, code promulgation, and political manipulation of ritual and rank. The early nineteenth century Gorkhali state like other pre-colonial polities in South Asia was simultaneously coercive and consensual, extractive and re-distributive.
机译:自18世纪中叶,当时服务于英国东印度公司(EIC)的军队与戈尔卡利强国发生冲突后,英国军官就将尼泊尔描绘成典型的印度教专制主义的典范。随后该地区的学者并未挑战这些表述,而是将殖民地的描述称为“事实”。对南亚过去集中和“专制”国家的刻画取决于对国家与社会关系的某种理解。它呼吁将戈尔卡利政权想象为对社会其他阶层的陌生人,并假设种族和种姓在一个世纪到下一个世纪都是僵化的。对土地系统和税收收入的过分关注,以了解戈尔卡利州的早期形成,同样也给我们提供了有限的叙述,这是因为它缺乏非财政性的政府创造要素。从该时期的文献中收集到的国家与社会互动的频率和数量掩盖了十九世纪尼泊尔对权力和统治的静态描述。这篇文章建立在以前未研究的资料的基础上,用对内部和外部力量的纠缠作出回应的静态“印度”专制国家的图片代替,并逐步将多元社会中的印度教政治整合在一起喜马拉雅山麓。产生的顺序是过程性的而不是稳态结构。戈尔卡利统治者通过相互交织的文学和宗教赞助,守则颁布以及对礼节和等级的政治操纵,成功地发挥了作用。像南亚其他前殖民政体一样,十九世纪初的戈尔卡利州同时具有强制性和共识性,提取性和再分配性。

著录项

  • 作者

    Rupakheti Sanjog;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2016
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号