首页> 外文OA文献 >Background report on best practices and informal guidance on installation level CBA for installations falling under Article 14(5) of the Energy Efficiency Directive
【2h】

Background report on best practices and informal guidance on installation level CBA for installations falling under Article 14(5) of the Energy Efficiency Directive

机译:适用于《能源效率指令》第14(5)条的装置的最佳实践背景报告和安装水平CBA的非正式指南

摘要

The Energy Efficiency Directive (EED), adopted on 4 December 2012, establishes a set of binding measures to help the EU reach its 20% energy efficiency target by 2020. Under the Directive, all EU countries are required to use energy more efficiently at all stages of the energy chain from its production to its final consumption. Member States were required to translate the EED into national law by 5 June 2014. The EED will repeal the existing Cogeneration Directive (2004/8/EC) and the Energy End-Use Efficiency and Energy Services Directive (2006/32/EC) as of 5 June 2014.Article 14(5) of the EED requires Member States to ensure that thermal electricity generation installations and industrial installations exceeding 20 MWth, carry out a cost-benefit analysis when they are planned or substantially refurbished to assess whether the use of high-efficiency cogeneration, the connection to a district heating or cooling network or other means of waste heat recovery would be cost-effective. The obligation to carry-out a cost-benefit analysis also applies to new district heating and cooling networks, when those are planned or when an energy production installation with a capacity exceeding 20 MWth is planned or substantially refurbished within those networks, in order to assess whether the utilisation of waste heat from a nearby industrial installation is cost-effective. If the benefits exceed the costs, the options analysed in the cost-benefit analysis must be included in the authorisation or permit criteria.The cost-benefit analysis has to be in accordance with the general methodological principles set out in Part 2 of Annex IX. A possible methodology for conducting a Cost Benefit-Analysis (CBA) in accordance with Article 14(5) and Part 2 of Annex IX of the Energy Efficiency Directive is presented here. The methodology takes into account the Guidance note prepared by the Commission for the implementation of Article 14, including the carrying out of the cost-benefit analysis by individual installations and district heating and cooling networks.
机译:2012年12月4日通过的《能源效率指令》(EED)制定了一系列具有约束力的措施,以帮助欧盟在2020年之前实现其20%的能源效率目标。根据该指令,所有欧盟国家都必须更有效地利用能源从生产到最终消耗的能源链的各个阶段。要求成员国在2014年6月5日之前将EED转换为国家法律。EED将废除现有的热电联产指令(2004/8 / EC)和能源最终使用效率与能源服务指令(2006/32 / EC), EED第14条第(5)款规定,成员国必须确保超过20兆瓦时的热力发电设施和工业设施在计划或实质性翻新时进行成本效益分析,以评估是否使用高效热电联产,与区域供热或制冷网络或其他废热回收手段的连接将具有成本效益。进行成本效益分析的义务也适用于新的区域供热和制冷网络,当它们计划中或计划或在这些网络中计划或实质上翻新容量超过20兆瓦的能源生产装置时,以进行评估利用附近工业设施的余热是否具有成本效益。如果收益超过成本,则必须在授权或许可标准中包括成本效益分析中分析的选项。成本效益分析必须符合附件IX第2部分中列出的一般方法原则。本文介绍了根据《能效指令》第14条第5款和附件IX第2部分进行成本效益分析(CBA)的可能方法。该方法考虑到了委员会为执行第14条而准备的指导说明,包括通过单个装置和区域供热和制冷网络进行成本效益分析。

著录项

  • 作者

    KAVVADIAS KONSTANTINOS;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2015
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 ENG
  • 中图分类
  • 入库时间 2022-08-20 20:53:27

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号