首页> 外文OA文献 >Hope and abundance: the counter globalisation movement as multitude – breaking the logic of pathological modernity
【2h】

Hope and abundance: the counter globalisation movement as multitude – breaking the logic of pathological modernity

机译:希望与丰富:众多的反全球化运动–打破了病态现代性的逻辑

摘要

Using the theoretical work of Hardt and Negri’s Empire and Beck’s Risk Society, I define current experiences of modernity as ‘pathological’. The term ‘pathological modernity’ is used because it portrays a modernity dominated by ‘spirals of crisis’ that are aggravated by the solutions proposed to solve them. Like the ‘war on terror’ and environmental degradation, I argue that many crises facing the world today reflect the characteristics of capital as they globalised, branded, hybridised, boundless and endless.‘Pathological modernity’ has various dimensions including a Cartesian logic underscored by an ‘eternal truth’, free-market fundamentalism, certainty in decision making, and a scientism which believes all challenges can be overcome. Additional dimensions include an operational form of biopower, pathological reflexivity, and a frontier disposition that continually encloses non-commodified spaces (or commons) creating a crisis of scarcity.Despite its dominance, pathological modernity is being challenged on many fronts. Amongst these is the ‘counter-globalisation’ movement (CGM). A heterogenous movement, it represents a qualitatively different form of globalisation and logic that brings it into conflict with pathological modernity.Using participatory research I investigate this movement grounding it within Hardt and Negri’s (2004) ‘multitude’. Extending Hardt and Negri’s descriptions, I propose that the multitude ‘works in common’ to establish new commons in both the physical and cultural spheres. Concentrating on the ‘cultural commons’ I argue that these represent a new form of biopolitics and promote abundance where scarcity once existed. The four cultural commons identified are hope, trust, safety and intellect. Based on the work of Marcel Mauss, I argue that the reciprocal, free and open exchange and sharing of these cultural commons creates ‘authentic’ communities based on openness, alterity and abundance. While the CGM works to establish new commons, pathological modernity encloses and commodifies them, turning hope into material aspirations; trust into anxiety; safety into security; and intellect into intellectual property.
机译:利用哈特和尼格里帝国以及贝克的风险学会的理论著作,我将现代性的当前经验定义为“病态”。之所以使用“病理性现代性”一词,是因为它描绘了一种以“危机螺旋体”为主导的现代性,而“危机螺旋体”则为解决这些问题而提出了解决方案。就像“反恐战争”和环境恶化一样,我认为当今世界面临的许多危机反映了资本的全球化,品牌化,杂交,无限和无止境的特征。“病理学现代性”具有多种维度,包括笛卡尔逻辑所强调的永恒的真理,自由市场的原教旨主义,决策的确定性以及相信所有挑战都可以克服的科学主义。其他方面包括生物力量的运作形式,病理学的反思性以及不断封闭非商品化空间(或公共空间)的边界布局,造成了稀缺性危机。尽管其占主导地位,但病理性现代性在许多方面都面临着挑战。其中之一就是“反全球化”运动(CGM)。它是一种异质性运动,它代表了质的不同形式的全球化和逻辑,使之与病理性现代性发生冲突。利用参与性研究,我研究了该运动,其依据是Hardt和Negri(2004)的“众多”运动。在扩展Hardt和Negri的描述之后,我建议采取“共同行动”,在物质和文化领域建立新的共同点。我将注意力集中在“文化公地”上,我认为这些代表了一种新的生物政治形式,并在曾经存在稀缺性的地方促进了富裕。确定的四个文化共同点是希望,信任,安全和智慧。根据马塞尔·莫斯(Marcel Mauss)的工作,我认为,这些文化公域的对等,自由和开放的交流与共享在开放性,变更性和丰富性的基础上创造了“真实的”社区。 CGM致力于建立新的公地,而病理性的现代性则将它们封闭并使其商品化,将希望变成了物质愿望。信任焦虑;安全变成安全;并懂得知识产权。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号