首页> 外文OA文献 >Secured by automobility: why does the private car continue to dominate transport practices?
【2h】

Secured by automobility: why does the private car continue to dominate transport practices?

机译:由汽车保障:为什么私家车继续在运输方式中占主导地位?

摘要

Use of the private car is often viewed as highly problematic. It is regularly associated with global physical, social and ecological harms such as climate change and epidemics of lifestyle diseases, including obesity.Attempts to address these problems generally include provision for day-to-day physical mobility based on alternatives to the private car. Labelled alternative transport, these modes include public transport, walking and cycling. Yet the private car continues as the preferred way to travel in many cities. A deeper understanding of this preference can reveal under explored sites of resistance to alternative transport modes.This study uses qualitative methods to record very personal barriers to the uptake of alternative transport. Its focus is on the use of the car for the journey to work in suburban Sydney - Australia's largest city. Applying a novel approach to participant selection, the study explores the daily practices and perceptions of those who continue to drive, despite having access to viable alternative transport.The study finds that resistance to alternative transport is more complex than findings to date suggests. Mobility practices stem from the active integration of skills, images and materials that potentially have little to do with transport. Instead, attachments to the private car, and resistance to alternative mobility, are products of other practices, such as parenting and working. The study reveals the way the private car is deeply engrained in the way people make sense of, and navigate, not only their streets but their place in the world.The complexity of the relationship between mobility practices and ways of being in the modern world can be represented through the concept of ontological security. Car-based autonomous mobility plays a key role in experiences of autonomy, predictability and acceptance - all of which act to sustain a sense of coherency to modern life. Transition away from car use disturbs this sense of coherency and is essentially ontologically threatening.This way of thinking about resistance to alternative transport exposes a number of sticking points for its uptake - junctures at which transition away from private car use will only occur in the face of unprecedented disruption to existing ways of 'being' in modern life. The research exposes a series of inconsistencies between the expectations of those planning for, and those anticipated to one day use, alternative transport.
机译:人们通常认为私家车的使用存在很大问题。它经常与全球物理,社会和生态危害相关,例如气候变化和包括肥胖在内的生活方式疾病的流行。解决这些问题的尝试通常包括提供基于私家车替代品的日常身体出行。标记为替代运输的方式包括公共交通,步行和骑自行车。然而,私家车仍是许多城市首选的出行方式。对这种偏好的更深入了解可以揭示出在探索的地点对替代运输方式的抵抗力。本研究使用定性方法记录了个人对替代运输方式采用的障碍。它的重点是在澳大利亚郊区最大的城市悉尼郊区上班的途中使用汽车。该研究将一种新颖的方法应用于参与者的选择,探索了尽管有可行的替代运输方式但仍继续开车的人的日常实践和看法。研究发现,对替代运输的抵抗比迄今为止的发现更为复杂。出行实践源于技能,图像和材料的积极整合,而这些技能,图像和材料可能与运输关系不大。取而代之的是,对私家车的附着以及对替代性机动性的抵制是其他做法的产物,例如养育子女和工作。这项研究揭示了私家车深深扎根于人们理解和导航的方式,不仅是他们的街道,而且是他们在世界上的位置。现代汽车出行方式与生活方式之间关系的复杂性可以通过本体安全性的概念来表示。基于汽车的自动驾驶在自主性,可预测性和接受性方面起着关键作用-所有这些都起到了维持现代生活连贯性的作用。远离私家车的过渡扰乱了这种连贯性,并且从本质上讲是对本体论的威胁。这种对替代运输的抵制态度暴露了其吸收的许多障碍-从私家车过渡的转变只有在面对的时候才会发生。对现代生活中现有“存在”方式的空前破坏。该研究揭露了计划替代运输的预期与一日使用替代运输的期望之间的一系列矛盾。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号