首页> 外文OA文献 >The activation, appropriation and practices of student-equity policy in Australian higher education
【2h】

The activation, appropriation and practices of student-equity policy in Australian higher education

机译:澳大利亚高等教育中学生平等政策的激活,拨款和实践

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Current national reforms in Australian higher education have prioritised efforts to reduce educational disadvantage within a vernacular expression of neoliberal education policy. Student-equity policy in universities is enmeshed in a set of competitive student recruitment relations. This raises practice-based tensions as universities strive to meet specific institutional targets for low-socio-economic status (SES) and Indigenous student participation, whilst broadening participation more generally within the sector. This paper seeks empirically to trace the activation and appropriation of federal policy through two sites of higher education policy practices: a state government-sponsored equity practitioner body and two differently positioned universities, Dawson and McIllwraith, as they engage with low-SES schools. Working together Dorothy Smith’s insights into the textually mediated activation of local practices, Levinson and colleagues’ concept of the local appropriation of authorised policy, and Bourdieu’s notion of the contested field, we demonstrate that the generation of state level and institutionally specific policies for student-equity practices not only articulates to federal policy, but also appropriates the ruling relations of mandated policy. Further, the scope of these creative local appropriations is organised within a hierarchical academic field through which particular institutional imperatives, as well as the needs of low-SES students, are negotiated. The analysis demonstrates the vernacularisation of policy in the national rearticulation of global discourses, in appropriation at the level of the state body and in the practices of equity workers.
机译:当前澳大利亚高等教育的国家改革优先考虑在新自由主义教育政策的白话表达中减少教育劣势的努力。大学中的学生平等政策已陷入一系列竞争性的学生招聘关系中。随着大学努力实现针对低社会经济地位(SES)和土著学生参与的特定机构目标,这会增加基于实践的紧张气氛,同时更广泛地扩大该部门的参与范围。本文从经验上寻求通过两个高等教育政策实践场所来追踪联邦政策的激活和拨款:一个州政府资助的股权从业者机构和两个定位不同的大学,即道森大学和麦克维尔大学,因为它们与低SES学校合作。多萝西·史密斯(Dorothy Smith)对以文字为媒介的本地实践激活的见解,莱文森及其同事对授权政策的本地拨款的概念以及布迪厄对有争议领域的看法的共同努力,我们证明了针对学生的州级政策和机构特定政策的产生-公平做法不仅阐明了联邦政策,而且还剥夺了强制执行政策的统治关系。此外,这些创造性的地方拨款的范围是在一个等级化的学术领域内进行组织的,通过该领域可以讨论特殊的制度要求以及低SES学生的需求。分析表明,在全球性话语的国家重新定义,国家机构一级的拨款和平等工作者的实践中,政策的语言化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号