首页> 外文OA文献 >Corporate governance mechanisms and earnings management in transitional countries – evidence from Chinese listed firms
【2h】

Corporate governance mechanisms and earnings management in transitional countries – evidence from Chinese listed firms

机译:转型国家的公司治理机制和收益管理–来自中国上市公司的证据

摘要

The objective of this thesis is to investigate whether the corporate governance practices adopted by Chinese listed firms are associated with the quality of earnings information. Based on a review of agency and institutional theory, this study develops hypotheses that predict the monitoring effectiveness of the board and the audit committee. Using a combination of univariate and multivariate analyses, the association between corporate governance mechanisms and earnings management are tested from 2004 to 2008. Through analysing the empirical results, a number of findings are summarised as below. First, board independence is weakened by the introduction of government officials as independent directors on the boards. Government officials acting as independent directors, claim that they meet the definition of independent director set by the regulation. However, they have some connection with the State, which is the controlling shareholder in listed SOEs affiliated companies. Consequently, the effect of the independent director’s expertise in constraining earnings management is mitigated as demonstrated by an insignificant association between board expertise and earnings management. An alternative explanation for the inefficiency of board independence may point to the pre-selection of independent directors by the powerful CEO. It is argued that a CEO can manipulate the board composition and choose the "desirable" independent directors to monitor themselves. Second, a number of internal mechanisms, such as board size, board activities, and the separation of the roles of the CEO and chair are found to be significantly associated with discretionary accruals. This result suggests that there are advantages in having a large and active board in the Chinese setting. This can offset the disadvantages associated with large boards, such as increased bureaucracy, and hence, increase the constraining effects of a large and resourceful board. Third, factor analysis identifies two factors: CEO power and board power. CEO power is the factor which consists of CEO duality and turnover, and board power is composed of board size and board activity. The results of CEO power show that if a Chinese listed company has CEO duality and turnover at the same time, it is more likely to have a high level of earnings management. The significant and negative relationship between board power and accruals indicate that large boards with frequent meetings can be associated with low level of earnings management. Overall, the factor analysis suggests that certain governance mechanisms complement each other to become more efficient monitors of opportunistic earnings management. A combination of board characteristics can increase the negative association with earnings management. Fourth, the insignificant results between audit committees and earnings management in Chinese listed firms suggests that the Chinese regulator should strengthen the audit committee functions. This thesis calls for listed firms to disclose more information on audit committee composition and activities, which can facilitate future research on the Chinese audit committee’s monitoring role. Fifth, the interactive results between State ownership and board characteristics show that dominant State ownership has a moderating effect on board monitoring power as the State totally controls 42% of the issued shares. The high percentage of State ownership makes it difficult for the non-controlling institutional shareholders to challenge the State’s dominant status. As a result, the association between non-controlling institutional ownership and earnings management is insignificant in most situations. Lastly, firms audited by the international Big4 have lower abnormal accruals than firms audited by domestic Chinese audit firms. In addition, the inverse U-shape relationship between audit tenure and earnings quality demonstrates the changing effects of audit quality after a certain period of appointment. Furthermore, this thesis finds that listing in Hong Kong Stock Exchanges can be an alternative governance mechanism to discipline Chinese firms to follow strict Hong Kong listing requirements. Management of Hong Kong listed companies are exposed to the scrutiny of international investors and Hong Kong regulators. This in turn reduces their chances of conducting self-interested earnings manipulation. This study is designed to fill the gap in governance literature in China that is related to earnings management. Previous research on corporate governance mechanisms and earnings management in China is not conclusive. The current research builds on previous literature and provides some meaningful implications for practitioners, regulators, academic, and international investors who have investment interests in a transitional country. The findings of this study contribute to corporate governance and earnings management literature in the context of the transitional economy of China. The use of alternative measures for earnings management yields similar results compared with the accruals models and produces additional findings.
机译:本文的目的是调查中国上市公司采用的公司治理实践是否与收益信息的质量相关。在对代理机构和机构理论进行回顾的基础上,本研究提出了可以预测董事会和审计委员会的监督有效性的假设。使用单变量和多变量分析的组合,对2004年至2008年公司治理机制与盈余管理之间的关联进行了检验。通过对实证结果的分析,总结了以下一些发现。首先,通过引入政府官员担任董事会独立董事,削弱了董事会的独立性。担任独立董事的政府官员声称他们符合法规所规定的独立董事的定义。但是,它们与国有企业有联系,而国有企业是上市国有企业附属公司的控股股东。因此,董事会专业知识与盈余管理之间的微不足道的关联表明,独立董事在约束盈余管理方面的专长的影响得到缓解。董事会独立效率低下的另一种解释可能是强有力的首席执行官预先选择了独立董事。有人认为,首席执行官可以操纵董事会的组成,并选择“理想的”独立董事来监督自己。第二,发现许多内部机制,例如董事会规模,董事会活动以及首席执行官和主席的角色分离与可自由支配权的收益有很大关系。这个结果表明,在中文环境中拥有一个大型而活跃的董事会是有优势的。这可以抵消与大型董事会相关的弊端,例如官僚机构的增加,因此,可以增加大型而机智的董事会的约束作用。第三,因素分析确定了两个因素:CEO权力和董事会权力。 CEO权力是由CEO双重性和离职构成的因素,董事会权力由董事会规模和董事会活动组成。 CEO权力的结果表明,如果一家中国上市公司同时具有CEO双重性和营业额,则更有可能具有较高的盈余管理水平。董事会权力和应计制之间的显着和负面关系表明,频繁召开会议的大型董事会可能与较低的收益管理水平相关。总体而言,因素分析表明,某些治理机制可以相互补充,从而成为对机会主义盈余管理进行更有效监控的机构。董事会特征的结合会增加与收益管理的负面关联。第四,中国上市公司的审计委员会与盈余管理之间的微不足道的结果表明,中国监管机构应加强审计委员会的职能。本文呼吁上市公司披露有关审计委员会组成和活动的更多信息,这有助于将来对中国审计委员会的监督作用进行研究。第五,国家所有权与董事会特征之间的互动结果表明,由于国家完全控制了42%的已发行股份,因此国家的主导所有权对董事会的监督权有一定的影响。国家所有权的高比例使非控股机构股东难以挑战国家的主导地位。结果,在大多数情况下,非控制性机构所有权和盈余管理之间的关联微不足道。最后,由国际四大会计师事务所(Big4)审核的公司的应计费用低于由中国国内审核公司审核的公司。此外,审计任期与盈余质量之间呈U型倒数关系,表明任命后一定时期内审计质量的变化效应。此外,本文发现,在香港联合交易所上市可以作为一种替代性的治理机制,以约束中国公司遵守严格的香港上市要求。香港上市公司的管理层受到国际投资者和香港监管机构的审查。反过来,这减少了他们进行自私的收益操纵的机会。本研究旨在填补中国与收益管理相关的治理文献方面的空白。以前关于中国公司治理机制和盈余管理的研究尚无定论。当前的研究建立在以前的文献基础上,并为从业者,监管者,学者提供了一些有意义的启示。,以及在转型国家中拥有投资利益的国际投资者。这项研究的结果有助于中国转型经济背景下的公司治理和盈余管理文献。与应计模型相比,使用其他度量进行收益管理的结果相似,并且产生了其他结果。

著录项

  • 作者

    Lin Teng;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2011
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类
  • 入库时间 2022-08-20 20:48:23

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号